Comments 1,188

Re: WB Games Own Magazine Leaks Batman: Return to Arkham for Xbox One

SuperKMx

@KelticDevil I agree that Origins probably should be in the collection, yes. But I also think that the line is sometimes tricky to see. If we're including Origins, why not include Arkham City Lockdown from iOS/Android? It's set before Arkham City and is canon, AFAIK. If we're including that game, why not include a comic book set to flesh things out further? In this case, I think they've judged it (arguably incorrectly) on critical reception as opposed to it being laziness or a want to bleed gamers dry, but I can also totally see why someone would be bothered about Origins not being there.

Like you say, good value is different to everyone. I'm not so invested in the story or lore so to speak so Origins isn't necessarily as big a loss to me as it would be to others. As I've said, the two games included in the set would be more or less entirely new to me and assuming they haven't suddenly aged to the point that they're unplayable, two full games for (probably) less than the price of one is appealing enough, given that I had fun with Arkham Knight.

And absolutely, it's gonna depend on the price. At £54.99 I'm not a player in any way, but throw this on the shelves for £30 and I'll at least take a long look.

Re: WB Games Own Magazine Leaks Batman: Return to Arkham for Xbox One

SuperKMx

@KelticDevil "But just because it makes good business sense for two companies, doesn't mean it's a good value for gamers."

Of course not. But then again, when somebody is saying that they understand that something is good business sense for two companies, they're not necessarily saying that it's good value for consumers, nor are they necessarily making excuses for anyone. They're saying that they understand the decision when others are saying that the decision can't be understood.

Nothing more, nothing less.

Re: WB Games Own Magazine Leaks Batman: Return to Arkham for Xbox One

SuperKMx

@tylertreese Also agree with this.

Arkham Knight is still going for £54.99 digitally, with a £32.79 season pass. It'll undoubtedly get a standalone Game of The Year edition towards Christmas that contains all the DLC. They won't throw all that in with a £40 set that already contains two games.

Plus, you've gotta believe that the folks who loved the Arkham games on 360 and who own an Xbox One, already own Arkham Knight anyway and will get this as the two 360 titles aren't B/C. Also, by just bundling the two, they'll potentially drive sales of Arkham Knight to people who maybe weren't so interested in City or Asylum the first time around, but who grab the remasters as they're great value.

It's a smart business decision from a developer that probably doesn't have anything else on the table this year.

Re: ​Editor's Opinion: The Search for Honest Game Reviews

SuperKMx

This is going to get worse, so I'm going to jump in and have the last word.

I agree with the point @tylertreese is making here, since it was in fact the crux of the article. Reviews are opinions. How can one be "incorrect" when the only way you judge the review is by placing your own opinion upon it? In the same way that the reviewer's opinion isn't worth more than anyone else's, why is anyone's opinion worth more than the reviewer's?

1) "My opinion is that this game gets 2/5 because that's what I feel it deserves."

2) "My opinion is that this game cannot be rated as low as 2/5 for that is absolute and utter nonsense."

How can one of those be wrong, without instantly invalidating the other one?

I'm not saying that people shouldn't disagree with reviewers, but to come out and call their opinions "wrong" or "trash" or whatever ("hot garbage" seems to be making a comeback) just makes me ignore them, usually.

As for never backing off your beliefs, more power to anyone that feels that way. I agree with you, though eventually I learned that has to be combined with flexibility. If someone comes along and gives unequivocal proof that the sky isn't in fact brown and is actually blue, then I'd be a fool to carry on holding up a banner that says "the sky is brown" simply because other people's perception would be that I could change and that somehow makes them think I'm weak.

Also, @KelticDevil, I read all comments on the site (they're plugged into my RSS reader) and most of the time @tylertreese actually has a valid point. His age doesn't remotely come into anything and that jab wasn't required, since he has more experience of this industry than a large percentage of people with twice as many years on the clock.

And trust me, I'm not just siding with the guy who writes for the site. I argue with him all day long, usually. When he's wrong. Which he is a lot.

Locking up...

Re: ​Editor's Opinion: The Search for Honest Game Reviews

SuperKMx

@Gamer83 I couldn't agree more.

In fact, the only reason I vote to keep them is the Metacritic/GameRankings factor. Without scores, we don't get listed on those sites. And those sites account for quite the percentage of our review traffic.

OpenCritic is a new similar site, which has a specific "Unscored Reviews" section, which I think is a great idea.

Re: Review: SUPERHOT (Xbox One)

SuperKMx

@KelticDevil I'll weigh in...the correct way is "I couldn't care less" but tons of folks use the other one.

Otherwise, you're saying you care a lot and could care less. As opposed to saying that you don't care very much and therefore couldn't care less. Not that it matters...both get the point across.

Re: Microsoft Ends Xbox 360 Production

SuperKMx

@Gamer83 You sire, are not wrong. As weird as it is to notice, Condemned was the first game that ever made me feel that my character was running around at night. It was SO dark for a lot of the time. Really atmospheric. Loved it.

Re: Microsoft Ends Xbox 360 Production

SuperKMx

@Tasuki Fair enough, though my point was that nobody is forcing you to buy the latest thing. Your 360 still works, and you can still buy an Xbox 360, and will be able to for a good while yet.

360 support on Xbox Live will continue for a long time, mainly because backward compatibility on Xbox One allows 360 games to be played online using the same systems that they do on the Xbox 360. So there's no sense in them turning it off and suddenly saying "B/C games won't be online playable now."

As for Deals With Gold, well...that's a different story. End of the day, if someone actually wants a game that much that they're willing to get upset that it hasn't been discounted, then they should pay the asking price. I'd imagine that backward compatible titles will eventually come into focus on DwG and then people will end up going "Man...backward compatible titles AGAIN?" every week!

Re: Microsoft Ends Xbox 360 Production

SuperKMx

@Tasuki With respect, they've just said that they'll stop making them. There are probably millions - as in actual millions - sitting in stores around the world, waiting to be sold. I can go to any game store in my town and buy one. Also, Microsoft probably have a stock of 360s large enough for supply to not be an issue for a good while yet. Also, LIVE still works on Xbox 360 and will do for the forseeable future.

So, if you want to play your Xbox 360 games now, you can still buy an Xbox 360. Or keep using the Xbox 360 console that you clearly already own. I don't understand the outrage?

They can't keep making these things forever, neither should they be expected to.

Re: Uk Folks Can Now Buy Digital Xbox Games at Their Local Convenience Store

SuperKMx

@stylon I remember the year I got an Amstrad CPC 464 for Christmas. I'd already been buying Amstrad Action magazine with my pocket money for months, so Christmas afternoon was spent typing in a listing from that mag that did nothing but drew Mickey Mouse on the screen.

Four hours. Didn't work. Had absolutely no idea what any error messages meant so couldn't debug.

I don't think I've ever been more upset. Still, a few rounds of BMX Simulator sorted that out.

Re: Latest Gears of War 4 Trailer Brings the Sadness

SuperKMx

@KelticDevil "Halo 2 pioneered online FPS on the consoles & is the game that got Xbox Live off the ground. It was one of the most popular multiplayer games of that generation"

Yes sir, it was. Introduced online multiplayer to a whole generation of gamers, not to mention satisfied people like me who had been lugging their Xbox to LAN parties to play Halo: CE in "System Link" mode.

Did my back the world of good when Halo 2 finally came out!

Re: Brand New: Issue 3 - Twelve New Xbox One Titles!

SuperKMx

@BAMozzy "Maybe people don't feel like 'commenting' because of the hassle they get for criticising indies or having an opinion that differs from somebody else!!"

Well that isn't it.

Maybe it's because when they do have an opinion that differs from someone else, they get bombarded with 1,000 word replies until they concede or get bored?

Re: Brand New: Issue 3 - Twelve New Xbox One Titles!

SuperKMx

@BAMozzy I disagree.

"They have no way of expressing that they have no interest" isn't right as they have the option to not vote. The results are a percentage of the people who have voted, as in any poll anywhere.

People have no problem writing "not for me" or "not at this price" on every other article that introduces new games or sale listings, or on Twitter, or on Facebook, that I consciously left the option from the poll. If they have a strong enough feeling to (for some reason) let everyone know that they have no interest in something, they'll comment, not that I see why they get involved with things they aren't interested in, anyway!