
Call of Duty 2023 is here, with Modern Warfare 3 taking the mantle this time around as the franchise's first 'back-to-back sequel' in its 20-year history. This year's game contains three main components: campaign, multiplayer and for the first time in the MW series, Zombies. But, how do they all stack up? And how does Zombies mode fit into Modern Warfare?
Well, first up, we had access to the game's campaign ahead of the full release - and we covered our impressions of it pretty extensively in our campaign hands-on. We'll drop a link to that below if you want to read a bit more about the game's single-player component, but the long-and-short of it is that MW3's campaign is still a good time - even if it's a little too short for our liking.
The meat of this year's CoD, as is usually the case, resides in the game's multiplayer suite. Things are a little different this year, with Sledgehammer's initial map lineup consisting of every single 2009 Modern Warfare 2 map - no more, no less. While there aren't any new arenas to play on at launch (some are supposedly coming in the game's post-launch seasons) these old school maps are largely a joy to play on and we must admit - it's a better starting roster than most modern CoD titles muster up. Yes, you feel like you're re-treading old ground a lot, but most of these maps haven't returned to the series since '09 and we're having fun revisiting them - and even finding new ways to play on them in 2023.
We've noticed some small changes across the maps as well. There are some handy new flanking routes on maps like 'Karachi' & 'Invasion', and generally speaking they do flow a little differently on the new CoD engine - as you'd probably expect. We're taking a particular liking to 'Wasteland' now that we don't have to deal with the original MW2's overpowered killstreaks, although for some reason, 'Afghan' doesn't seem to work as well in 2023. Largely though, these maps form a fantastic day one lineup and even though we've already played them for 100's of hours, we have no real complaints about blasting around them again.

As for the under-the-hood gameplay, if you played last year's game you'll know exactly what to expect. MW3 is built off the very same tech as 2022's Modern Warfare 2, and it all feels very similar to that game in this area. Modern Warfare 3 is a little bit faster and more frantic — addressing a general complaint about last year's slower-paced gameplay — but elsewhere it's all very similar. In fact, you can use all of your MW2 weaponry in this year's release alongside the new MW3 additions - and the game certainly feels like 'DLC' in this regard. It all slots in pretty seamlessly, but yeah, there's not much of a 'new' feeling to MW3 multiplayer - it's just a good job that those old MW2 maps are still really fun to play.
We've played a good amount of MP so far and things seem quite well balanced at the moment - certainly more than the original MW2! The new MW3 primary weapons do seem a little stronger than what's been ported over from last year, but we're sure the team will continue to tweak all of that after release. CoD multiplayer is an ever-evolving thing these days, and it remains to be seen what setups are truly 'meta' just yet.
Before we move onto Zombies, we did want to mention the MP spawn system. The dev team has already acknowledged certain issues with the system right now — even removing some map/mode options from the game temporarily — but we've not really run into too many issues ourselves. That's probably because we mostly stick to deathmatch-based modes with the odd foray into 'Domination' - but we've not seen anything too out of the ordinary when it comes to spawns. Hopefully these map/mode combos return to the game soon.

Right, moving onto Zombies mode and we must admit - it's a massive weak link within Modern Warfare 3. This is the first time any sort of 'Zombies' mode has featured in Modern Warfare, and looking at this lacklustre attempt we're not surprised about that. Zombies this year is a total reskin of Warzone's 'DMZ' mode from last year - a re-hash that contains hardly anything that made Treyarch's original Zombies mode so great in the first place; save for the human enemies dressed up in fleshy zombie attire.
On loading Zombies up and picking a mission from the overly-complicated menu system, we were dropped into a massive battle royale-style map with little direction over what to actually do. We starting picking off Zombies, gathering contracts and looting weapon crates, but it's all very scattershot and just doesn't feel complete at all. We did the thing, we ex-filled in a helicopter, and we searched for another game - already quite bored with the whole mode after just one or two games. Zombies this year is an afterthought; an undead spin on the 'Extraction Shooter' - and we can't wait to play some proper CoD Zombies when Black Ops developer Treyarch returns.
Conclusion
Modern Warfare 3 is quite a tough game to judge. Its campaign is good old Call of Duty fun, even if it's too short, and the game's multiplayer is a great time - built on the solid foundations of two different versions of Modern Warfare 2. However, Zombies is a complete miss this year, and the admittedly-great multiplayer is based on past triumphs more than anything else. If you love playing some CoD multiplayer every year then MW3 is another solid entry in that regard, but if you usually stick to one of the other modes or are looking for a more complete Call of Duty experience, we don't recommend picking this one up just yet. Either wait for a price drop, or bide your time in anticipation of its eventual arrival on Xbox Game Pass!
Comments 23
They won’t do it because it’s a console/PC cash cow, but MS should give it a years break and really give it a good going through with fresh eyes.
That $69bn feeling worth it right now?
@PsBoxSwitchOwner I get that it's a cash cow, but idk man they've entered into a 10+ year continuity agreement with Sony.
It could be a great move for MS to move some Call of Duty resources/studios away from CoD and into content that can be exclusive to Game Pass (Crash, Tony Hawk, etc). Turn CoD into a 3 year release cycle, have those games be more impactful, give Sony less of that comission money, and put more content exclusively onto MS's platform.
The question is: Does Call of Duty make TOO much money as a yearly release to mess with its release cycle?
I dont know, reading you calling the campaign good but short after the complete massacre of it from other sites….
Let's be honest,.this should have been DLC with a price tag of maybe $40. But Activision wanted to squeeze out all the can out of every consumer before CoD went to MS.
@mac_da_man I'm invested in the ongoing story, so keep that in mind, but it is good. Right up until it ends abruptly. The open combat missions are obvious filler, but fun filler that let you go wild for a level, here and there. It was obvious DLC, but what's there is alright... until that abrupt end. Thankfully Zombies and the MP are solid as heck.
If MS aren't carefull, this cashcow will kill itself. Thats in nobodies interests, so I hope MS turn this around....
They should make a current-gen reboot next, that is, not last-gen consoles, based on World War I or II and the next one based on modern warfare, while supporting Warzone. Each of them with enough development time and letting the other Activision studios do the other IPs: Crash, Spyro, Tony Hawk's and some old IP revival.
@StreetsOfRage99
That $69bn feeling worth it right now?
For Microsoft absolutely. This COD will likely make more profit than all the Game Awards nominees combined. And that's before you even consider the other cash cow in the room King mobile.
53 on metacritic lmao, Cod's demise is past due.
Slightly bias review - the campaign has been trashed on other sites but here it’s “not bad”
I thought the campaign was great. It took me about eight hours. So, not much different than every other COD I've played.
Game is fun, thats all i can say. I got it for the old maps (That i know) some maps i never played on so they new to me. I like that I got to keep most of my weapons from MW2. Despite those that think this should be DLC. I feel like this is exactly how a sequel should be produced. A new game, plus everything I earned from last game, and a bunch of new stuff to get this game. I'm all for it. Still a bunch of maps from Modern Warfare 2019 i wish they add in this one.
@nickevans2210 I've read more users saying that they liked it. If anything is biased is the 0/10 review bomb. The thing that actually sounded odd to me was this, "While multiplayer is fun, it brings nothing new to the table."
@Sol4ris And the free-to-play Warzone! I read a while ago how much money does ABK make per year and it's not going to take many years to get the money back, but it's also positioning what they were after. Both are related but the latter is key.
@mac_da_man how about making your own mind on games?
Maybe the campaign is just good? Have you thought about that?
I didn't play Zombies so far, but I never liked that mode.
I don't regret getting MW3. Campaign is good, Multiplayer is great.
And i will sink another big time into this game, so I give a ***** about the price arguments of some trolls.
@Nintendo4Sonic no, it never crossed my mind.
If you think a short campaign meant to be dlc with an abrupt ending that doesnt conclude ***** is good, great for you. If thats the new bar set for CoD, enjoy the future.
I expected more.
@mac_da_man isn't the campaign what people cared the lowest about? Personally, my main reason to buy CoD today is the Multiplayer.
I'm surprised that people are so offended about the story campaign.
But never the less, I enjoyed the campaign so far.
@Nintendo4Sonic i play CoD mainly for the campaigns, like some easy blockbuster action every now and then, and maybe some multiplayer.
If they´re not gonna bother making great campaigns like they used to then imo they should just make multiplayer and zombies.
@mac_da_man I do understand you.
I used to be like that too and bought CoD mainly for the campaign.
I still want a campaign in these games. But I highly enjoy the Multiplayer so much, that it turned to be the main spot for me.
Personally I didn't enjoy MW 2019 campaign, I think it sucked.
But MW2 was way better in my opinion, better story and way more interesting levels, enemies and so on.
I'm not done yet with MW3 campaign yet. But I already had a good time.
The thing is it is an expansion marketed as a full game. $30/$40 would have been fair.
Unpopular opinion - I think that the campaign is quite fun so far and I really like the open missions. I have just got to a stealth mission though, not very keen on it, so I am hoping it's a one off and it's back to the blasting next!
very simple, I have always played COD since 2005 and what is COD for me, just 20 minutes to 1 hour sometimes some multiplayer bOEM bOEM and the campaign i DON't care
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...