
As we move through the fourth year of Xbox Series X|S, we're surely approaching the back-half of this generation of gaming - which has us often pondering where Microsoft might go next. Lately, 'Xbox handheld' rumours have been swirling — fuelled by the likes of Phil Spencer talking about such a prospect — and that's got us asking ourselves that very question. Would we be okay with the next Xbox being a portable console?
At the start of the current gen we could have never imagined such a future. A handheld Xbox in this day and age? When we've wanted one for years to no avail? How could that happen?! Well, the ongoing success of Nintendo Switch and the revelation of the Steam Deck and other such portable PCs seems to have changed the landscape.
Let's not forget either that Microsoft has its own portable gaming ambitions. At one stage it seemed like we were getting a 'Firestick-like' Xbox device to play cloud games without a console - although 'Project Keystone' was eventually scrapped. Could wee see another two-pronged console approach with a low-power, cloud-focused handheld alongside a proper Series X successor for Microsoft's next generation? Honestly, the possibilities seem endless at this stage.
We'd quite like that scenario; a mirror of Xbox Series X and S but swapping out the cheaper console for something that's handheld and entirely cloud-based. It'd mean less complicated development and maybe more of a focus on the high-end console and what it can really do. Xbox Series S is a great little console, but it often misses out on proper next-gen features in modern games.
How do you see this all going, then? If Microsoft wanted to go portable, would you be okay with a Steam Deck-like next-gen system? Would you want a supplementary handheld console in some form instead? Or, do you want Xbox to stick entirely with a traditional home console for the next generation?
Go ahead and talk all about what you'd like to see down below.
Comments 82
Mind? I’D LOVE IT!
I wouldn't buy their next home console, so I wouldn't mind if it was a portable.
That would be pretty cool! If an Xbox handheld did exist, I’d love to try it out. The possibilities of taking your game library on the go sounds really fun.
I think the best thing they could do is release both a new console and a handheld together in the same console generation, sort of like what Nintendo did with releasing the WiiU in close proximity with the 3DS and 2DS. If Microsoft did that, I believe both console gamers and handheld gamers would be equally satisfied!
I'd be 100% behind a handheld Xbox. Once it gave access to my library of bought games and all could run on it, it's a day one purchase.
Wouldn't mind at all, I have the Rog Ally as well as the Series X and it's excellent.
Personally, I would prefer the option of a higher end home console, because that's what I play the most. I have a switch but I play it docked something like 95% of the time. I also have a ps5 but I don't care for a PS portal (LOL).
But I can see the appeal of launching a portable console. It's where "the youth" play, and they are a huge demographic that generally speaking, mostly play either Nintendo or mobile games.
If it's a supplementary system, i might even buy it, but if it becomes the main console, I might just stick with whatever Sony releases (sad, I know) or just go back to PC (which I have been considering but also dreading because I'm lazy and don't want to bother with building/maintaining one).
Handheld at the cost of power would not be of interest to me. I do practically zero handheld gaming (even on my Switch)
As long as it was more powerful than the Switch I would happily jump on an Xbox handheld.
The PS Portal is amazing but limited as its streaming only so tied to a decent wifi connection
Following the success of the Switch, I think both Microsoft and Sony missed an opportunity to iterate the docking concept. I could see a game console that runs at 1/4 power on the go by leveraging the unit’s on-board CPU and once docked leverage a docks built in GPU to exceed base spec capabilities.
@Sifi How's the performance of Xbox games on the ROG Ally?
Depends on what it is. I might not buy the next generation of Xbox consoles at all if this generation doesn’t change course soon.
Mind? I demand it!
But not at the cost of NOT having a "powerful" console as well, of course, to me the ideal is a companion set of complimentary devices that create an ecosystem of taking my library portable and also a "pretty" option for the couch, not unlike Steam + Deck but without the $3000+ PC.
That's the ideal for a lot of people and is the one thing the Switch is missing is the ability to take those games and make them "really pretty" on the big screen. Maybe Switch 2 will fix that, but I still think trying to get both from one device is pushing it. Having a complimentary pair of devices meant to do one thing well isn't necessarily much more expensive than having one device trying to do everything all in a tiny cooling space. Xbox not being reliant on physical media like the other two gives it one advantage, like Steam, in doing that.
The big factor will be if an Xbox handheld can manage to be more powerful than whatever Switch 2 is, while also remaining price-feature competitive with it and Steam Deck. OLED Deck has that nice big battery and HDR screen which is to die for, but at $550 for 512GB, I think it's still a hard sell even though it's a good value for the tech, technically.
Streaming is ok, but wait times and lack of quick resume make it fail to replace the value of a real instant on handheld. Streaming from a local console is a little better at that, but still has annoying wait time to get in and out of the game vs a true handheld. If you're a true game junkie, every second saved counts!
@Chaotic_Neutral PS portal is actually pretty bad at streaming. You'd think they'd do better on their own device, but it's the software that holds it back. Sony's own streaming app is horrible, definitely behind Xbox's and also behind the 3rd party PSPlay. I almost bought the Portal a few times for the big screen when it's come in stock "just because" and the thing that holds me back is despite the smaller screen, my G-Cloud (Admittedly, more expensive than Portal) using PSPlay has a better image quality, though smaller screen, when streaming than the Portal, and also the Portal's ridiculous, very Sony, decision to not support bluetooth headphones and instead rely on their own proprietary format or wired. Even Nintendo eventually supported BT in a patch. Even freaking NINTENDO!
Not a handheld fan so I guess no.
But it depends on what they do games wise.
Will they makes specifically for the hand held or home console, pc etc etc and hand held, so no one misses out. Under their current trends I guess it will be another device amongst many that their stretched studios have to deliver on as well.
@OldGamer999 If they don't manage to screw it up (we are talking about Microsoft here) I think Deck and Ally would be the benchmarks for what it will be. Either a dedicated "Series S Lite on a battery" or a mini-PC with an Xboxified windows. I.E. it would run your whole Xbox library, as-is, which would be the whole point of its existence. The only development effort would be similar to "certifying" for Deck for PC games. A more comfortable, "Switch" that plays my Xbox library and has Game Pass? Yes, definitely want that.
I expect Sony to do something like that eventually, I think Portal was kind of market test more than a finished product. Vita shall rise again.
@fabio1 Screw "the youth".....My Sega Game Gear needs a sequel, darnit! If you're a true gamer, being away from your couch is not an excuse to stop making progress...
Why on earth would they go the handheld route? Nintendo has that absolutely locked down with Switch and upcoming Switch 2.
Steam Deck has only sold around 3 million units in the years on the market. Asus Rog has only sold 500k units. So why leave the console space to chase a space even more dominated?
If it's not a traditional console I'll have to pass. And would be the first time I've ever not bought an Xbox.
Doesn't really interests me. I prefer another Series S-style home console.
Handheld game pass machine? Yes plz
As long as it is a true next system. Not scaled down, low spec system like the Switch is.
We already have the Series S. No need for any further inferior systems.
@CaptnDave Thank you!
Not interested at all, bring on a beefy next-gen machine!
I want the two tiers. High powered home console and the Series S to become a hybrid dockable handheld.
It will be interesting if they do make a portable, they have some work to do with drm stuff to make that appealing. I hope they do it though.
Because this generation ended before it began, it’s going to be tough to sell people in an even more powerful machine when this one is so underutilized.
I feel like the portable will take the place of the S series. There will be a powerful "X" console, and the portable in place of the "S" series.
@GuyinPA75 I mean at this point it would easily be a bit more than the current series S. Even if the put out a 1080P 7+ inch screen that is a mini series S in a portable it would be awesome. If it's for next gen, then i'm just worried that the power would make it cost stuipd money and i'm not buying a $600 handheld.
@Blaa They perform great, though it does not run Xbox games natively. It has windows on it, which allows for great compatibility with gaming stores and support for pc game pass, but that is also its Achilles heel. For game pass games and games that support it, it has cross save and cross progression so you can play on the Xbox and put it on the ally. It also can stream to the cloud, as well as your Xbox.
@NEStalgia i think Sarah Bond already gave the blue print alongside Phil’s love for a handheld. It’s all but been confirmed that we will see the biggest leap in a console cycle ever. So that screams a console and not handheld. Then Phil saying when he is away he wants the Xbox Ui, friends list and achievements, progress on a handheld. So it seems like we get both which would be the ecosystem i think MS is trying to create.
I will be honest i built a PC online that i want and it hit $3,800 and that didn’t include the case or monitor. I am saving up for it just in case the negative rumors of Xbox leaving hardware is true. Which i hope it’s not. PC just feels like the future and one were i can enjoy the games i want running in the performance i desire. About time i save that much money tho i will be getting a 5090 instead of the 4090.
im not buying the next xbox "hardware", i 've suffered too much mental distress this gen. i expect next gen xbox will top out at 15 million buyers, half of this gen. its a snowball effect see.
If it replaced a traditional console, yes I would mind it. I would be downright pissed off. If they added a portable alongside a traditional console, I would absolutely love it and I would buy both. I do not want one to replace the other.
So long as I can still get a next XSX experience on my TV, I’m happy to have a hybrid consul. I just want high fidelity console gaming with quick resume. If it’s also a handsome, let’s ***** GOOOO!
Zero interest in it. Especially if how they're handling console hardware is any indication of how it would be.
If they wanna do a Switch/Steam Deck type thing, so long as they're not stepping back in perfect romance, then sure. But I'm not messing with anything past that.
Well the next console is the white series x but after that I suppose so why not but I wouldn't be buying it and we are still a couple years away from the next generation Xbox
I moved from Nintendo switch cause I was tired of half baked ports from third party, on series x I can play third party games at 60fps with decent resolution, so I don't want a portable xbox with no first party games and can barely play other games. At least Nintendo have good IP, Microsoft just can't compete with them.
I don't play on the go, so no.
I'd prefer Microsoft release a "gamer's version" of Windows to compete with Steam OS, Chimera OS, etc. that can be installed on any machine, but which "Xbox consoles" are manufactured for as a sort of baseline for playing games on the new OS.
@Grippie Absolutely agree 110%. That would be outrageous price for handheld. But I really not want tradeoff quality like Nintendo did with the Switch.
Nintendo can afford to do that since their customer base is 1 children that not know better. 2 hardcore fans for years on end. 3 both 1 and 2. Nintendo can just simply get away with soooo much.
If it’s more powerful that steam deck and can be 1440p at least with Dolby speakers and Bluetooth for any headphones yes with oled screen
Cool when it comes out . When it comes out i hope the battery life will last for a long time . And not as short as the handhelds from new . And hope you can still play the games without a wifi .
@HonestHick Technically she Said "technological leap" not "power leap" so it's vague and probably alludes to the pcification, hardware AI etc. It could also be something interesting like an egpu dock where the handheld is the main console with a big boost in the dock. Not convinced of that but it could be. Ms is one of the few companies that played with egpu in a retail product, the original surface book, but also abandoned it because it wasn't cost friendly.
Pc is an awkward thing. Yeah you get what you pay for, but ultimately you're spending 3800 for a 2-5 year rental before it's obsolete anyway. It sounds great until you're on your 3rd 3800 build in 10 years. Putting it in perspective you're buying nearly 8 Series X/PS5s for a similar use duration. That's a lot of money to play video games while the masses are happy with a phone and a switch and studios budgets are broken. Gaming is very financially broken...
@NEStalgia yeah i agree financially the games industry is in an odd place. Now i do hope the Xbox sticks around and i can largely avoid PC and play on a Xbox PC console and the handheld. That would be the best way forward for me. I don’t know much about the egpu so i couldn’t say. But i think the handheld will go on the side to the console and build a better ecosystem. It’s my guess anyway.
@HonestHick The impression I got was that the future of Xbox console is PC. You get a Xbox branded handheld that's basically the ROG Ally with the Xbox logo on the device and some Xbox branded desktop PC that's super powerful and expensive. If you want your Xbox library, you can play it via the cloud but you can also play PC games natively via Steam/Microsoft Store/Epic Games Store.
I've said it for a few months now, but I think it entirely possible that the next generation of Xbox will be a very powerful handheld, and that Microsoft will forgo the traditional console.
I see this, in part, as a reason why all future Xbox 'exclusives' will be timed, and will be ported to the PlayStation 6 to 12 months after release, and then, after a couple of years, day and date with the PS6.
I was talking to my son about this only this morning, and I have to admit, if I find myself in the position of being able to afford only one console next generation, then, if Microsoft are indeed porting all their games to the PlayStation, then I will likely just buy a PS6. I do still have a high end gaming PC, so if I am desperate to play something (such as a new Gears of War) then I'd have it covered anyway. If Microsoft do go the route of only having a handheld, then they will have made the choice for me as I have no need of a handheld anyway. I've have a Switch for over 2 years, and the only game I have played on it is Breath of the Wild, and even then it was docked.
I'd like to be wrong. I'd like it to be the case that owning an Xbox console is essential (I don't enjoy gaming on a PC as there is often a lot more faff involved), but following the success of the first 4 games being ported to the PlayStation, I have no doubt in my mind that many, many more will follow, with the next big one being Starfield towards the end of this year, and I would anticipate the likes of Hellblade 2, Avowed, and Indiana Jones will go across at some point next year.
Ultimately, I think owning an Xbox will become less and less of a necessity, which saddens me greatly...
@Grumblevolcano that very well could be the future. It’s hard to tell cause we don’t have the roadmap just yet. But if they are targeting 2026 then it won’t be to long before we hear about what the plans are.
@Fiendish-Beaver as much as i know you hate to write that and as much as i hate to admit your right…. You’re right. Many more titles will be coming to PS5-PS6. The question is how and when do they do Halo, Gears and others on PS. Cause that is going to send ripple effects through the internet for weeks if not months. What is that announcement going to look like? Plus it will ensure that no other company would be able to come in and compete with PS at the high end. Unless Nintendo ever decided to get back into powerful consoles and that is just not going to happen. Sure if they did MS would bring the games to them, but it’s just not the Nintendo way to compete on specs with PS. Xbox has just backed itself into a corner and i think the only way out is PC. But that begs the question if anyone would even care. Most will just be on PS or Steam. MS will be the 3rd wheel for a few hardcore Xbox fan’s that will be left. I will try and make a happy ending to this. If MS is bringing its games to PS, can they bring the controller too? Cause that is what i would miss the most is the off set thumb sticks and the Xbox controller. Just make the same controller with the PS button symbols and I’d be ok. 😊
If it could run the newest games coming out and not limit future tech, it'd be the best idea ever.
Also it needs to be able to dock.
A portable game pass machine that actually ran great and had mainline Xbox/all modern console games playable at competitive fps/etc and it would outsell whatever playstation console was left alone on the market imo.
The switch showed us long ago that flagship and portable means massive sales.
Do the same thing with much higher quality?
Everyone will have one.
Absolutely everyone.
DO IT
@Fiendish-Beaver I think that makes some assumptions about the difference of a handheld and a console though. It feels like it's 2016 all over again talking about this in the late WiiU era. Look at Ally, Legion, Steam Deck.....it's not PC versus that. That is a PC. It's a full-on PC. You can install Excel and run figures to your heart's content. Technology caught up. You can run a PC on a battery that fits in your pocket that not that long ago required a mid-tower and half a dozen fans. The most popular games on consoles, Fortnite and Minecraft, run on a telephone with a fraction of the power of a dedicated handheld. A Switch is more powerful than a WiiU, and slightly more powerful than a PS360. Switch 2 and especially a hendheld Xbox will certainly have more power than an X1/PS4.
So, then...why define the difference of a handheld and fixed console? Maximum possible power? We've reached a ceiling. Yes the machines got so powerful, but the problem is developers can no longer make games that make use of all that potential power with a budget that can be repaid by the amount of customers they actually have at a price those customers are willing to pay. Something has to give. They either need to magically triple their customer size...but..how? Or they need to just start charging double while they struggle to charge what they're charging, and everyone would rather play free or nearly free games on phones, or they need to turn back the clock and turn the graphics down a few notches. And if doing that....why not use hardware that can run handheld? It's more power efficient, ultimately more resource efficient, appeals to a larger potential audience, and can share a lot with the existing mobile industry.
I think there's still a circular problem with the whole argument of MS bowing out. If Sony is left alone they are going to throw their weight around and get greedy. Like we just saw with Helldivers 2 until they finally caved. But only because they're in someone else's playground. They'll tick off customers and publishers alike. Which will cause a strong shift toward PC. But the PC market is expensive and disorganized which then opens the market back up to a managed PC experience. Which brings us right back to the whole Xbox PC environment. If it's not them, someone else will do it.
@Grumblevolcano I agree overall, but I think the "PC" part is going to be a lot more like a traditional console, albeit somewhat more expensive, than you're thinking. They're not going to target super high-end, super high-price, because you can build a traditional PC for that market space, they're not trying to compete with the Newegg builders, that's it's own premium market, they're trying to target a value PC space with the branded pre-made box. Considering the most common hardware on Steam isn't super enthusiast PCs that's a sensible take. And it won't be a square beige box, it'll still look a lot more "console-like" being essentially a gaming laptop, not desktop PC parts, and therefore also allowing a custom hardware design and cooling solution, like a console, like a laptop, in a small, attractive, thermally managed case. "An XBOX PC future" means PC architecture, parts, and OS, not internal/external form factor, necessarily. To the consumer I don't think they'd even notice it's "not a console like old Xboxes" anymore. It's more about developers, storefronts, etc that it would matter to. And of course enthusiasts who know the pros and cons of it.
I also think that there will definitely be some sort of emulation layer, both on handheld and on the console-PC for playing your Xbox library games, not just "cloud for the non-PC stuff." Either a native translation, or a hardware AI based thing, I think the old games playing natively will absolutely happen, and also allow the storefront and licensing deals to carry over.
@HonestHick eGPU is an Nvidia thing, that's literally an external PCIe bridge to allow a GPU to be housed in an externally powered chassis, like an external HDD connected via a cable over a proprietary interface. People rumored Switch was going to have a "Pro" dock with that, back in the day which of course it never was. The advantages are that it's easier to change a GPU, and also keeps GPU heat outside the system chassis. And most importantly allows for laptops to have access to a big, powerful GPU when docked without just eating battery when undocked. In practice very few builds ever used it, and the most notable one was the first Surface Book that had a bunch of modular options and one of them was an eGPU interface, so you could dock your razor thin laptop to a super powerful eGPU, intended in that case for graphics workstation productivity work, not really gaming. But the cost was very high and I think they discontinued it pretty quickly. But that was some years ago, and I could see them designing a console around a handheld main console that then docks to an optional eGPU base sold separately to make it a powerful graphics machine. I'm not saying I think that necessarily is what they're doing, but it's a possible design if they want to focus on "everyone buys the same base console/handheld, and an add the big GPU and external storage separately." Depends how costs work out but the Nvidia/Intel rumor means it's at least possible. And the fact that their Surface team is really the only team that built a commercially viable eGPU product ever. Even if, in the end, it turned out not to be marketable.
@NEStalgia you made a ton of good points. I just want Xbox to be more clear. They need to hire someone to speak for them. They are in their own way. Of the 3 consoles it’s the Xbox we never know what to expect and not in a good way. I still think it would be a waste of everyone’s time at ABK & others if MS bought them, gave them new tools to work with, made them part of the MS company only to tell them in less than 5 years they are going to just make games for PC and PS and Xbox is leaving hardware. So in my heart and mind i still think we are going to see some kind of hardware, but we have no idea as to what it will look like and i think it’s safe to say it probably won’t compete with PS, so they might not be able to sell enough of them to skip brining Gears and Halo to PS consoles. 10 years or less of that and they would just go 3rd party. So i am still confused as ever as to what the roadmap looks like for Xbox. They have options and of course studios and money. But how do they want to use that? Your points all make a lot of sense and i hope some of those come true.
Possibly, if it implies that it's dockable, then I won't need to be tethered to a Tesla charging station to use it.
I hope they have learned from the Kinect.
Portable sold seperate
also
Sold as bundle
I would absolutely love the next Xbox to be portable.
So does the Steam Deck play 4K, @NEStalgia? I don't believe it does. It also cannot achieve 120HZ. Now, it's possible that Microsoft will achieve this with a handheld, but I won't hold my breath. Also, being a handheld, I very much doubt it will play my sizable 4K/blu-ray collection, which is what I currently use my Series X for.
I absolutely see the benefit to Microsoft to take this route, but it is unlikely to be of any benefit to myself. It's highly unlikely that any new handheld will be capable of matching my PC, and so I'll simply end up keeping my Series X to play my huge library of digital games that I have (currently topping 860).
All of this depends on the strategy that Microsoft take from here on out. If they do as I suspect, and port pretty much everything (new and old) within 6 to 12 months, then I may as well get a PS6 and happily wait to play the games on that console. If there is something that I cannot wait for, my PC has me sorted.
All of that said, if Microsoft don't throw everything on the PlayStation, and give me a reason to own their console, then I'll happily buy the next console whatever form it takes, but I have my doubts as to whether I'll be doing so, as I firmly believe the writing is on the wall when it comes to Microsoft porting games...
I totally agree, @HonestHick. It does make me sad, and I also much prefer the Xbox controller. I'm currently playing Stellar Blade on my PS5, and I've lost count of the number of times its told me to press X and I've hit the wrong button... 😂
Depends if it plays (then) current third party games.
I love xbox but if the next platform doesn't get all third parties and they've increasingly open on the idea of all exclusives going to PS... then why have it? Nintendo survives has a handheld because it the only place to get Mario, Pokemon, and Zelda
Mind? I wouldn't mind because I would simply ditch 😂
Feel like by the time Microsoft would make it appealing, the Steam Deck will have been made better. And anything Microsoft would make for it would also likely launch on said Steam Deck Day One.
@Fiendish-Beaver PS5 has the best controller of any PS console for me and yet it still isn’t my favorite. Not sure i can ever main console the PS for that reason. I’d have to go PC over PS5 for some games just so I could use the Xbox controller. .
I've seen multiple YTbers blame Series S for "holding back" the Xbox and in the same breath, say Xbox should put a portable in the place of Series S next gen. How wide do you think the performance divide would be then? They could even shrink a current Series S down (with more RAM, of course) 4 years after launch.
Can it play Crysis?
Not really. A hybrid would be best, but I'll support it either way. Loving the Xbox with gamepass, so I'll continue on.
@Fiendish-Beaver I mean rumor is switch 2 is 4k docked via dlss, so, maybe? And it depends if it has an egpu dock or is companion to a normal console of course. But it can't be ruled out for sure.
Though as for Blu-ray I wouldn't doubt ms goes digital only next Gen and Sony follows the Gen after. But, then if you're already on powerful PCs... Why mess with ANY console? 🧐 Other than switch because Nintendo.
I'm still thinking switch 2 will be a struggle for Nintendo. I think they know that and is part of why the delay. With more players at the gates of the hybrid market their unique feature set is becoming pedestrian. I'm not sure where they'll go next, or if without iwata they know how.
@HonestHick I think if you ask 10 people in the Microsoft executive offices those questions you'll get 14.75 different answers. That's their whole problem.
@NEStalgia yes that is for sure their problem. They need to really think before they speak. Make sure the strategy and messaging behind it is being delivered right. But it seems like behind the scene’s they are just throwing idea’s out and trying to find the one that best sticks. Nothing seems clear and concrete to me. They get out around 10 AAA good games before the end of Series consoles with a strong message of what their next gen plans look like and they might find themselves in a better situation.
Absolutely zero interest at this time. Maybe when my kids get older.
If it's a portable then I will pass. I am not much of a portable gamer. Even my Switch I play more docked then handheld.
I currently use my steam deck with xbplay and it is a fantastic way to play all my xbox games in the garden or when the wife wants to watch one of them murder shows... I love the playing native games on the Deck but sometimes I just want it to work at high settings rather than try to wrangle a few more frames at low settings... A hybrid model would be best for me, exactly as already have...
@Mooky779 I played all of Sea of Stars on Steam Deck through XPlay/XCloud. My only gripe is that you still can't play your own games that way, so I have to consider this when buying games.
@theduckofdeath I just started sea of stars on xbox remote - Quick resume is fantastic as I jump between games a lot and need to put the game down often. I am also playing games from xcloud like state of decay 2 and Forza horizon, it's a great experience totally seamless so far.
A portable option would be fine, but only if there is also a traditional console option. I have a Steam Deck for example... wonderful device, but it in no way can replace my gaming PC. It's just a nice accessory.
Yes, I would mind it. I come home and play games on my console and big screen TV. When I'm not at home I'm working, and not playing games.
@rustyduck Dramatic much? But seriously, how have you "suffered." I swear gamers are some of the most dramatic spoiled brats ever. If a dev even thinks of not having hyper realistic ultra high fps, gamers go freakin rabid. Just enjoy the games and be happy. It's a console, not an ex lover who cheated on you with your best mate then moved out and took the dog.
@abe_hikura Not the only place. Emulators are far more powerful and accessible than the switch. Why TF would I pay $200+ for the Switch when I could get an emulator for less than a quarter of that price if not free AND play past and current games all at a better graphical quality? Never bought a Switch and will never buy one. I'm happy to play my emulators on my phone if I need something portable.
Mind id camp outside for one money wating its happening you watch!
@AshKirin19 The mention of "suffering" was a bit much, I agree (assuming there isn't some missing context that drastically changes everything!), but when they're spending $500+ on a console, are they not entitled to good games and good technical performance?
I'm sure we could all stand to be more thankful in general (I know I could), but these are expensive products, not gifts. That's where I take issue with the whole "entitlement" spiel.
Really not interested in portable systems in general... but if I did need one for some reason, it would have to run the games natively, as that's the whole point of being portable! Apparently, there's a larger market for a cloud-based handheld than I had thought, but regardless, it has absolutely zero appeal to me, both in principle and in practice.
i hope microsoft sticks to traditional system , but i don’t mind portable if traditional stays . handhelds don’t appeal to me anymore since the DS lite. the only reason switch sells so much in america is because it can be docked and they killed off the ds; had it been portable only i doubt it would’ve been as successful
@AshKirin19 have you ever heard of hyberbole ? maybe you should chill. his comment didn’t even warrant all the unnecessary tirade you responded with
I'm not interested in a gamepass, digital only handheld from Microsoft. Microsoft stated that the next generation of Xbox will be the biggest generational leap. Which means that they will still have a stationary console. Unless they meant in the handheld space it would be the biggest leap. Handheld technology will always lag as its just a physic's and area issue for system on chips.
Perhaps the handheld can be for the xbox series s crowd and the alleged real powerful xbox can be for the home console crowd like myself. I think that a handheld xbox system should only be a supplement to a home xbox console.
Even my switchgets played docked.
No intrest in such a machine and definitely would not buy it. Shame as Ive bought all previous xbox's.
Pure handheld, no. But, hybrid? Absolutely. Just go all the way,hybrid with external GPU dock, MS. You target bigger market by doing so and this will allow mid-gen upgrade to be seamless and cheaper for your customers.
Nah. Between Steam Deck and Switch/Switch 2 I'll have access to pretty much any game I want in portable form. I can't imagine what Microsoft would do to tempt me away from those ecosystems.
I think I'm getting old. The most portable gaming device that I want is a laptop. It's mainly due to screen size and I really don't like holding that much weight and holding it closer to my face than I would a controller. After a while, it's just uncomfortable. A laptop has a much bigger screen and you can use a normal controller. The only downside is that it doesn't fit in your pocket, but I don't think any of these current portables will fit in a pocket either. My gaming PC is a laptop and it is hooked into my gaming TV most of the time, so I guess I already have my version of a switch. I do have a handheld Anbernic device that I play from time to time for retro games. It's only a three and a half inch screen, but it's very lightweight and the graphics don't have lots of detail, so it works out.
Mmm! Not for me... I do have a switch which I play quite regular in handheld, but only the quick pick up and play games. I can't imagine playing a 30 hour AAA, story driven game on a handheld.
I want both - console and handheld.
TBH Xbox could release the most powerful handheld in the world and it wouldn’t sell anywhere near enough units. Again. Xbox cocked it right up with Xbox One but with the Series X/S they have not marketed it, they have not even tried to make up any ground and they have now proved that the only reason that they were buying companies was just to stops others getting them.
Slowly, one by one, they are now closing studios as if it’s some sort of game - pun not intended.
My relationship with Xbox is coming to a close. They have shafted every Xbox fan and they do not care.
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...