
Update (Tue 23rd Jul, 2024): With Call of Duty: MW3 joining Xbox Game Pass this week, we thought we'd share some of our older coverage to give you an idea of what to expect. Below, you'll find our original "hands on" of the MW3 campaign from last November, which highlights what you can look forward to from a single-player perspective.
We do also have a full review of Call of Duty: MW3 here at Pure Xbox, but keep in mind that the multiplayer aspects have been regularly built upon since last November, so it's a more outdated read. You'll find that review here:
Original Preview (Mon 6th Nov, 2023): Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 3's campaign has been out for a few days now in early access - ahead of the full game's launch on November 10th. This has given us a bit of time to blast through the game's single-player component and give you some impressions on Call of Duty's direct story sequel to last year's Modern Warfare 2.
Now, we'll address the elephant in the room right away - MW3 is short, noticeably shorter than last year's game. This time around, the team has stitched together "open fire" missions with more traditional, scripted levels and this definitely makes the whole package feel a bit less 'premium' than MW2 - and even than its predecessor Call of Duty: Modern Warfare.
However, the quality is still there for the most part, and we actually quite enjoyed our time with the MW3 campaign. The story follows MW's typical ragtag crew of Soap, Ghost, Price and co., and familiar series baddie Makarov makes his grand return in this year's game. Makarov and his place in the whole affair is no-doubt the standout here - his introduction carries the storyline and gives the whole thing purpose - even if those "open fire" missions contribute to a less-scripted campaign overall.

As we've come to expect from recent CoD titles though - the interstitial cutscenes are really high quality and do a good job at bridging together the levels, just about making it feel like a cohesive experience. MW3's structure isn't perfect, but it follows a fairly typical formula for CoD - perhaps feeling a bit more like the older, less cinematic days of the franchise.
From a gameplay perspective we quite liked those open levels though. We'd have loved to see some more multi-layered objectives thrown into them but we had no issue with the series opening things up a little bit and adding in Warzone-like features such as weapon crates, loadouts etc. Beforehand, we thought we'd take issue with their place in a CoD campaign, but for us, they broke things up quite nicely and served as a good way to change up the pace.

When it comes to the more cinematic levels, CoD does start to show its age a bit here. They work OK and play out fine — especially if you haven't been around the block 15 times with the series already — but the same old token stealth mission, repetitive gunship level, breach-and-clear shenanigans do wear a little thin in 2023. These levels are fine, and the campaign certainly feels like it needs them to make it feel like a proper scripted story, but don't expect to be experiencing much new here if you're a series veteran.
The gunplay is absolutely top notch however, with Sledgehammer taking everything Infinity Ward has done so far with this new MW engine and basically sticking with it. You'll feel like you're using lots of the same guns, gear and attachments as last year's game, which is a fair criticism if you look at it that way, but it is a direct sequel so we expected that feeling going in. As for the core mechanics - they're the best in the business anyway so why fix what ain't broke?
We played through this year's game on Xbox Series X with the 120FPS toggle enabled, and it's a good-looking title that's for sure - even at such a high frame rate. However, we did run into some crashes during one mission (although they disappeared on a second playthrough so we'll give it the benefit of doubt), and those aforementioned feelings of it being less 'scripted' meant it just wasn't as impressive a spectacle as last year's release. MW3 has some great tech under the hood, but it doesn't do much to properly show it off.

All in all, the Modern Warfare 3 campaign is a Call of Duty single player story - no more, no less. It's certainly on the shorter side for the series (although some entries definitely fall in a similar category, notably the original MW3 from 2011), and 2022's Modern Warfare 2 absolutely feels like it had more care and attention crammed into it. We wouldn't recommend putting your hard-earned money down on day one for this year's release (wait for a price drop if campaign is your thing), but as part of the overall package for MW3, we had a good time - and that's what it's all about. We'll have to wait and see how it slots into the overall package when Modern Warfare 3 is out in full on November 10th, but for now, the MW3 campaign is a satisfying experience - even if it leaves you feeling a wee bit short changed.
Our full scored review for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 will go live next week, once we've been hands-on with the rest of the game.
Comments 32
Same as usual so fine with me!
It looks ghastly...and you might one of the very very very few who thinks that it's the usual COD campaign, cause it simply isn't.
No thanks I'll give this game as missing woudnt pay 20 for this game nevermind 70 rip off game
Have to disagree with the quality still being there. Sure it looks nice. But the "open combat missions" are utter garbage, the story goes nowhere, it ends on a cliffhanger just as the story has an interesting beat. It was the most bored I'd ever been with a CoD campaign.
Sledgehammer need to be removed from making "full" titles. They just haven't proven they can do it.
I Pre ordered on 10/20/2023, cause thats my birthday and i got a lot of Xbox gift cards for my Bday. Think i paid $15 for it and for the MP it is well worth it. I beat the single player yesterday and it was ok. I’d give it a 6/10 campaign. Looking forward to the old school maps. Sure it’s just DLC and not their best effort. But i will have fun with it and it gives me a small break from grinding Diablo 4. Which i am above 600 hours on. I am looking forward to seeing what grabs my eye in 2024. As there is sure to be some big hitters. COD tho needs a lot of upgrades and updates. They need to leave cross gen behind and go for something big and exciting.
@BRT15
It looks ghastly
If you mean from a graphical standpoint than a trip to specsavers is definitely due mate (other grievances are be subjective of course)🤣. Your graphical dressing down of FM makes perfect sense now.
Should have kept this as a DLC as originally planned/rumoured rather than go all in on greedtown with the pricing.
@Sol4ris hahaha. Nah not graphically mate but the open type missions are just horrendously made. Not sure if you've seen how they play.
I still stand by my FM opinion though. Some of the car models are so bad they could be out of a mobile game. Their "ground up" comments was purely marketing speak and they've clearly just copied the stuff over from their older games.
How can someone praise this campaign is beyond me. Holy heck...it's so so soooo bad. The worst in the series by far. A cash grab game with reused assets, maps, objectives...open-world like garbage. I don't understand what the heck were you guys playing but even the ending is a slap in the face
Loved the single player campaign on both Modern Warfare (2019) and Modern Warfare 2 (2022) but don’t think I’d bother with this one. Being that it’s shorter than normal, they’re already short enough and it’s not got the best reviews so I’d rather pass than even bother to be honest.
@AFCC because MS have just bought the franchise.
Removed - off-topic
Sounds like another used $19.99 item for me at Gamestop next year. All I play is single-player multiplayer is toxic and I am old and slow.
It's wild that IGN attached a score and full review that only covers the smallest aspect of the game.
@BRT15 It looks ghastly? Or did you think it played ghastly? My point - did you play the campaign? Because I did. It took me about eight hours and I thought it was a great COD campaign. I believe there's a lot of COD hate going on right now, especially because Microsoft now owns Activision. Everyone seems to be jumping on the COD hate bandwagon just because Sony-loving sites are convincing us how bad it now is. Play the game yourself, and then form an opinion. That's what I did. Turns out, I loved my experience.
@BacklogBrad It's wild that they gave it a 4. Almost unbelievable considering how good the campaign is. As if there is an ulterior motive.
@AFCC Great campaign. Perhaps we didn't play the same game. Or maybe, just maybe, you didn't play the campaign at all and saw the ending on Youtube. Lol.
@AFCC I wouldn't exactly call this impression "praise". It basically says MW3 is still fun because the core shooting is fun and it looks nice. It is fine™. The only reason why this game seems so terrible is because it's standing next to two of the best shooters released in the past five years.
@Romans12 I believe in this case a lot of the hate is more down to it clearly being DLC that has been repackaged as a bare bones full price release. Nothing to do with MS on this occasion.
Will skip MW3, still busy with MW2 for a longggg time. 3 feels like it should have been DLC. Will wait and see what they will do now they are in team Xbox.
It's been said repeatedly this was a large DLC packaged as a new game. Seems like this falls in line with that. Maybe MS can do some quality control now.
I like CoD only for campaigns. Knowing this one is short, I'll definitely wait for it to hit GP sometime next year.
I just can't justify paying the price for this. £60-£70 for 4-6 hours of gameplay? I've also seen a Vault Edition for £100....😬
It's currently just a rip off in my opinion. 😒
Just watched bits of a full game walk through, it looks alright ,but the game lasted 2hrs 7min are they taking the piss, clearly dlc
@Kaloudz The campaign part gets crapped on every release. All the focus in on the online multiplayer content which is why I haven't played these style games in many years. Call of Duty is not the only game to fumble this.
@Kaloudz no idea,what on earth is dlc like,ive heard at the end of the game there's a message that says ,someone will return in mw3 ,so whats this then ?
@Kaloudz for 70 quid....oh right
@Kaloudz If it is expansion like, they really shouldn't be charging full price in my opinion. I realise there is the Multiplayer and Zombie Mode that may justify it eventually.... but still, £70 is just too steep.
@Kaloudz Yes without a doubt, the game will still sell by the bucket load.
Hello! With Call of Duty: MW3 now joining Xbox Game Pass, we've republished this "hands on" to give you an idea of what the single-player campaign is like
It isn't worth the time to play single player, one of the worst COD campaigns. I think the reason to give it on GamePass is to give something attached to Call of Duty name and likely it's worst selling for the three of the new Modern Warfare games.
Smart from a marketing perspective and to say they are doing something nice before BLOPS 6, but if you think about it's a petty move for the consumer. It would be better to give MW1 or MW2.
It's worth time in multiplayer but that's about it.
@Kevw2006 Yeah, I think it comes down to a few biases that do not allow the reviewers to evaluate the game itself:
1. MS won and acquired ABK 😢
2. "Consolidation is bad!" fearmongering
3. Call of Duty is "too popular"
4. Call of Duty is "too successful"
5. Bobby Kotick "won"
6. The campaign is not the normal fleshed out standard
7. "I'd rather be playing Mario or Zelda"-anything types
These sites thought the game or ABK needed to be punished. The reviews were their version of review bombing. An attempt to "send a message." It didn't work. No reasonable person would think MWIII was actually a 4/10.
176GB! It’ll probably take longer to download it than it will to play the campaign.
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...