@InterceptorAlpha Sure, that is a fact. But that doesnt mean it is better. If you are gaming at 1440p versus 4k you are also missing out on 4,6 million pixels. That is also a fact. If you prefer framerate over anything else you could also just play on 720p at lowest graphic settings and that will increase your fps immensely and reduce the latency even more. I suspect you don't do that, but why not?
@InterceptorAlpha That's just your opinion though. You formulate yourself like others are wrong for not sharing the same opinion you have. It would be the same as me saying that you are wrong because 4k 60 is better than 1440 120.
I use DLSS, on all the games that support it. On many games it actually looks better than native resolution. But if I have to choose between max graphic fidelity at 60 fps or lower graphic fidelity at 120 fps. I will lock it to 60 every time, unless I am playing a competitive multiplayer game. Fps isn't everything to everyone.
@InterceptorAlpha I wouldn't exactly make the claim that best possible graphics at 4k 60 fps is equivalent to driving a Honda Civic. I would rather equal it to driving a Rolls Royce or another luxurious car. You might not drive down the highway so fast that your vision is blurred, but damn you're comfortable.
Now i'm not claming this to be your opinion exactly, but I, as well as others, disagree with the clam that fps trumphs all, no matter how the game looks.
I own a PC and I game on my couch on a oled tv with a controller. If I play a game on a lower resolution than 4K, I can tell that it looks blurry and bad. And that matters way more to me than playing at 100+ fps.
@InterceptorAlpha I'd much rather play my SP games at best possible fidelity 4k 60 fps on my oled tv, than make the game look worse just to get more fps. For me fps doesn't matter if the game looks like crap, it can be really immersion breaking.
I am really sceptical when I read: "Rockstar, the maker of Grand Theft Auto, is reinventing itself as a kinder, gentler company."
I have no problems playing as a female character, and can't see why anyone would, as long the character is well made. And if there is a company I would trust to make a good character, it's Rockstar. But if your going to strip away the fundamentals that made the previous games so great, because your worried you might offend someone, I can't help but being real sceptical..
@Trmn8r Metro Exodus enters the chat. That's an example of Ray Tracing done right on console. You should absolutely check it out. It's the best lighting I have ever seen on a console game.
Comments 6
Re: 'Atomic Heart' Dev Shares Next-Gen Performance Targets Ahead Of Game Pass Launch
@InterceptorAlpha Sure, that is a fact. But that doesnt mean it is better. If you are gaming at 1440p versus 4k you are also missing out on 4,6 million pixels. That is also a fact.
If you prefer framerate over anything else you could also just play on 720p at lowest graphic settings and that will increase your fps immensely and reduce the latency even more. I suspect you don't do that, but why not?
Re: 'Atomic Heart' Dev Shares Next-Gen Performance Targets Ahead Of Game Pass Launch
@InterceptorAlpha That's just your opinion though. You formulate yourself like others are wrong for not sharing the same opinion you have. It would be the same as me saying that you are wrong because 4k 60 is better than 1440 120.
I use DLSS, on all the games that support it. On many games it actually looks better than native resolution. But if I have to choose between max graphic fidelity at 60 fps or lower graphic fidelity at 120 fps. I will lock it to 60 every time, unless I am playing a competitive multiplayer game. Fps isn't everything to everyone.
Re: 'Atomic Heart' Dev Shares Next-Gen Performance Targets Ahead Of Game Pass Launch
@InterceptorAlpha I wouldn't exactly make the claim that best possible graphics at 4k 60 fps is equivalent to driving a Honda Civic. I would rather equal it to driving a Rolls Royce or another luxurious car. You might not drive down the highway so fast that your vision is blurred, but damn you're comfortable.
Now i'm not claming this to be your opinion exactly, but I, as well as others, disagree with the clam that fps trumphs all, no matter how the game looks.
I own a PC and I game on my couch on a oled tv with a controller. If I play a game on a lower resolution than 4K, I can tell that it looks blurry and bad. And that matters way more to me than playing at 100+ fps.
Re: 'Atomic Heart' Dev Shares Next-Gen Performance Targets Ahead Of Game Pass Launch
@InterceptorAlpha I'd much rather play my SP games at best possible fidelity 4k 60 fps on my oled tv, than make the game look worse just to get more fps. For me fps doesn't matter if the game looks like crap, it can be really immersion breaking.
Re: Report: GTA 6 To Return To Miami, Could Be With Us In 2024
I am really sceptical when I read: "Rockstar, the maker of Grand Theft Auto, is reinventing itself as a kinder, gentler company."
I have no problems playing as a female character, and can't see why anyone would, as long the character is well made. And if there is a company I would trust to make a good character, it's Rockstar. But if your going to strip away the fundamentals that made the previous games so great, because your worried you might offend someone, I can't help but being real sceptical..
Re: Hands On: Cyberpunk 2077's Next-Gen Upgrade Is A Major Improvement On Xbox Series X
@Trmn8r Metro Exodus enters the chat. That's an example of Ray Tracing done right on console. You should absolutely check it out. It's the best lighting I have ever seen on a console game.