
Server shutdowns are becoming a common thing on Xbox (and other platforms) these days, and unfortunately, so is the practice of locking modes or even entire games behind these servers - meaning they eventually become unplayable.
Sometimes, the developer goes the extra mile to add offline functionality when this happens, but there are plenty of situations where that's not the case, and Ubisoft's The Crew suffered that fate when it was closed down in early 2024.
Since then, a group of Crew players have actually tried to sue Ubisoft over the shutdown, presenting a series of arguments about why they feel cheated, and Ubisoft issued a lengthy response in February that's over 35 pages long.
We'll let you dig into the full document if you want to, but the bit that's getting attention from the likes of Polygon and GamesRadar is where Ubisoft's lawyers mention you "cannot complain" over the game being shut down permanently.
Here's an excerpt about this:
After making their purchases, Plaintiffs enjoyed access to The Crew for years before Ubisoft decided in late 2023 to retire and shut down the servers of the ten-year-old video game. Plaintiffs received the benefit of their bargain and cannot complain now that they were deceived simply because Ubisoft did not then create an offline version of the discontinued video game.
In this section, it's also mentioned that The Crew's access is "entirely consistent with what Ubisoft marketed to them", and that the game's packaging featured clear references that a server shutdown could render the game useless.
The packaging contains clear notices that Ubisoft could “CANCEL ACCESS” to aspects of the game that were “REQUIRED” to play, thus putting Plaintiffs on notice that they did not have unconditional access and ownership.
Now, to be fair to Ubisoft, this all makes total sense. If you're putting clear warnings on your marketing material, the consumer is taking the risk that their game will no longer be playable, and it's happening with multiple titles every year.
That's not to say we like it though! 2K has become particularly bad at this in recent years, locking single-player modes in games like PGA Tour 2K and TopSpin 2K behind servers that inevitably get shut down in just a few years.
For what it's worth, Ubisoft followed up the controversy surrounding The Crew's shutdown in 2023 by announcing that The Crew 2 and The Crew Motorfest would receive offline modes to prevent the same situation from happening, which is a lot more than some games get - so hopefully it'll become a thing of the past with Ubisoft specifically.
The plaintiffs are still keeping up their arguments though, with an amendment filed back in March that Ubisoft has until the end of April to respond to. If anything else comes up that we find particularly interesting, we'll let you know!
What are your thoughts on this whole situation? Tell us down in the comments section below.
[source polygon.com, via gamesradar.com]
Comments 28
It shouldn't be seen as deceiving since many, many games shutdown like this and they have a disclaimer but I do think people have the right to complain about the shutdown.
That lawsuit will go nowhere if it hasn't already been thrown out. The only recourse is to boycott their other games, post bad reviews, tweets, etc.
Just one more reason to despise Ubisoft.
As if we needed more.
We buy licences to modern games. Like Windows software licences.
Licenced games/software are either updated (Starfield) or stagnant (Mirrors Edge Catalyst) or shutdown (the game described herein).
So, Best to use subscription services to get your temp licence always.
No one actually owns a game - all they own is a Licence to access the software which does not always guarantee you will continue to have access. That licence may only be for a specific Hardware (like a LOT of older games that require the 'hardware' it released on) or whilst the servers were active (as a lot of MP games are no longer playable 'online'
Yes OLD games may have had single player modes and any 'MP' was tagged-on in the early days of online gaming - before that it was couch co-op/MP only. But owning Goldeneye or Mario Kart on N64 doesn't mean I can access those games 'today' - unless I still have the Cartridge, the Hardware, controller, TV it can plug into etc. I can't go and buy a new N64, new game or controller as they aren't manufactured anymore.
I think the only thing we as gamers could argue over is the amount of notice given and/or what can be considered 'reasonable' for a game to remain 'active'. I also think that there should be more clarity to let people know its closing - maybe even be 'delisted' 6m before it does go offline so no-one can buy it as it winds down.
At the end of the day, it's probably in their Terms and Conditions that people don't read but 'agree' to before they play. The game isn't 'yours'. The game, its code, assets etc belong to the Pub/Dev and you pay for a licence to access/play it.
If I don't own the product I've paid money for then piracy isn't stealing.
Swings and roundabouts.
"Ubisoft followed up the controversy surrounding The Crew's shutdown in 2023 by announcing that The Crew 2 and The Crew Motorfest would receive offline modes"
Which still hasn't happened in almost a year and likely never will.
Ubisoft really are an awful company. That's why I no longer buy their games.
I suspect the fact they added offline modes to the other online only games after this is going to work against that if it gets to court.
@NishimuraX Ubisoft probably won’t exist in its current form by this time next year, they just have to wait it out!
@dskatter
Well as I said I don't buy their games anymore. Last one was Odyssey. Ubisoft could be sold off and broken up tomorrow and I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep.
I don't buy EA or WB titles anymore either.
Lol my local branch of Cash Converters has a boxed copy of The Crew for sale at only £2, what a bargain!
Yves is such a moron, its amazing he hasnt been fired yet. Ubisoft has fallen so far from what it once was. Just reskinned, open world slop every year now.
@abe_hikura
They haven't added offline modes, they just said they would at the time of the backslash then it all went quiet. That was almost a year ago.
AAA publishers gaslighting customers is nothing new though.
@NishimuraX This is a very wise decision, and I fully support it!
I totally disagree with the author of this article. Ubisoft used deceptive language when saying only aspects of the game and not virtually everything.
@BigRedPaper
Yep. As I said above. Ubisoft are gaslighting the customer.
Fraser is a good author for this site, one of the best and most passionate I feel, so I'm a little disappointed he's bought into Ubisoft's narrative, if only a little.
I mean, I don't want to throw fuel on the fire, but nothing lasts forever, right? Everyone knew it would eventually be delisted and taken away...
@NishimuraX I’m disappointed too
Ubisoft lawyers should get used to not owning their jobs.
The problem for Ubisoft is that players these days tend to have a backlog. I bought The Crew 2 when they had the really steep sale. I still haven't started up the game. Which means I still haven't agreed to the EULA. Also the fact they made physical copies and they end up getting resold.
The Crew was out for over 4 months before I was able to even get online to play it. It took awhile for them to get the game patched there were a lot of people like me who couldn't get online to play it.
Whatever Ubisoft, I am now comfortable with not owning your games. Heck I am getting comfortable with you no longer being in business. Bye!
@NishimuraX I am tired of being disappointed with today's video games journalism. Seems like everyone on gaming sites is a sellout now a days. It's why I no longer care about what they think.
@Kaloudz There is a big difference between a game being delisted and a game being no longer playable. A game getting delisted is like physical copies no longer being produced, that should have no impact on your ability to enjoy what you already purchased.
My attitude is never buy any game day one since you're better off waiting until it drops in price. Online games are lots of fun but the problem is that they go offline and the whole game vanished most of the time. Most online titles usually only last a few years before they are permanently shut down. The gamers will likely lose the lawsuit but it the only other choice other then giving up. I don't know much about the particular game but they could of easily claimed that the would always be available but had stated in the standard 50-100 page term of use that they could shut down the service at any time.
If I don't own anything that I buy from them, whether it be a physical item or a license to something, I will continue NOT owing anything from them by not buying anything from them. Most of us understand that we are buying a license to a piece of software, but it is implied that the license does not expire unless otherwise stated and we have the expectation that it will be accessable indefinitely. Maybe the money I paid them to BUY the license should be revoked when the license gets revoked.
@JayJ @NishimuraX Well I mean when you put it like that then yeah, I can kinda see the issue, but for me (a long term devout Ubisoft fan) it's hard to hate them. They create some of the best games on the planet with some of the best IPs going imo.
Biased, yes. I'm not even sorry lol.
@NishimuraX Of course it's subjective. It's my opinion lol. But more to the point - I can't help absolutely adoring their games can I? Me enjoying their games (and I do - I love their IPs - Rayman, AC, GR, PoP etc...) doesn't mean anything other than exactly that. I love Ubi! Always have, always will.
Does it bother me that there's a group of people put out by the above Crew story? No, not really. I couldn't care less. It's not my issue. Lol. But that's just me.
@NishimuraX I mean, you've edited your comment but your comment before you edited it said that you were going to block me...
I'll overlook that and reply to your comment as is. My attitude is just my opinion. If I could wave a magic wand and fix the grievance people have, I would. But am I really expected to care, at all, about a game I don't have any interest in, and about a group of people I don't even know?
That's the problem with today's society. People are expected to go with the flow and pretend to give a toss about something they don't have any care in the world for. That's not me. I don't care in the slightest. If me being honest paints me out to be a bad person, then so be it. I'd rather be true to myself than blend in with the flock.
If a game I enjoy gets the same treatment then that's my cross to bear. But will I sit here and expect people that don't care about the game, or people that don't know me to care about my grievance? No... and that's the difference.
Edit and now you've edited it again to point out that you'll block me after all 🙄 smh
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...