Last November we took a look at some of the early public tests for Ark: Survival Ascended on Xbox and found some "interesting results", and now the team at Digital Foundry has given the game a pretty scathing review from a technical perspective - roughly six months after launch.
In a fresh face-off from the tech-focused outlet, the 2023 Ark remake is labelled as "the worst optimised Unreal Engine 5 game we've seen on console". If you look at the video up above, the evidence is pretty damning - the Xbox Series S version looks like a different game almost!
"PS5 and Series X both target 1440p, but with dynamic resolution scaling almost always engaged the game is often rendering at its lower bound of 720p, a 50 percent scale. For Series S, the same logic applies, with a 900p target but most pixel counts resolving to an internal resolution of 450p (again 50 per cent scale)."
To pair with those pretty low internal resolution figures, the frame rate looks to be all over the place in the console versions of Ark: Survival Ascended.
"Kicking off, we have Series S with its 900p target and 450p typical internal resolution. The game is fully unlocked to 60fps, though performance is normally about half that - or worse in dense jungle areas or the scorched earth map. In my playthrough I also found an area in North Zone 1 of the island that dropped frame-rates to as low as 13fps, especially when raining and at night.
Switching over to Series X, we're at least closer to the 60fps mark, with a higher target resolution of 1440p - 720p internal. Frame-rates are generally in the 30-45fps range, but I did spot drops into the high 20s in some areas, like our Series S northern jungle stress point."
Despite playing around with some in-game settings to improve things a little bit, the DF team still thinks that "we really need a push from the developer itself to optimise the game". Xbox Series X and S clearly aren't the real issue here - it's more the actual game itself and how it's been optimised for console play.
Well, what do you make of this? Have you tried the game out for yourself? Tell us all about your choppy dino adventures down below.
[source eurogamer.net]
Comments 26
i don't think this dev likes the series s but on series x i had it running fairly well with console commands to turn off clouds, shadows, and something else i forget.
i have almost 12k hours in ase and im 100% burnt out on this. i can no longer get myself to play any survival game now.
@rustyduck 12000 hours?!? I'm baffled by this. Why have you put yourself through this?
Didn't Xbox give this developer a bunch of money for not only gamepass releases of Ark and it's remaster but also invested in the development of their next game? You would think they would have taken the time to optimize the Xbox version a bit better.
@Blaa i know, it was so fun to me. thats 12k over the years. thats mostly at a very janky 15 to 20 fps on og xbox one. im cross eyed now and hate any game that isn't 60 fps on series consoles.
@rustyduck I tip my imaginary hat to you good sir
I’m lucky this sort of game doesn’t interest me so now loss of a game to me.
Literally run like ass on all platforms it target. Maybe this game is just so fundamentally code-broken and messed up. Need to be rebuilt from scratch by talented devs for it to run better.
Considering the performance of the original game even on Series X, I am not suprised
@Savage_Joe I had a great time with one of my playthroughs on the series s for Elden Ring
I know everyone will concentrate on the series s but that's terrible on both consoles I'm pretty sure everything under the hood of the series x can produce better than that honestly🙈
@Blaa elden ring looks great on series s I agree
@endlessleep I wish kids would stop using the word literally.
@Blaa Same. I've started Sonic Frontiers too. 60 fps. While there is pop-in, there's pop-in on every version of the game
@rustyduck I had to look that up and it's 1 and a 1/3 years of none stop play, that's both impressive and frightening 😬
@Kieduss okay old man
Series S was the worst idea in the world. It basically demands that games don't perform too well which in turn affects the series x. We'll never see anything using all of the series X's power due to games having to work on a less powerful series S. I hope for next gen, Xbox sticks to one console.
@Deljo sometimes i felt like i was living ark, not playing it.
Unbelievable to witness 720p / 30-45 Hz in 2024.
@Thumper And that's the high-end console. The Series S is doing 450p and sub-30fps, like a Switch game.
Then there were games like Sonic Adventure, which delivered a full 480p at a mostly stable 30fps... in 1998!
Series S is a monumental mistake by Microsoft…..I know it’s cheaper, but wait a little longer, save a bit more money and by an X for Gods sake….🤷🏻♂️
@Hutchilawd
Absolutely agree…..2 Xbox next gen, I’m out. Seriously contemplating PS5 Pro when released end of this year. Love my XBox series X ( I have 2) but the hardware future looks grim
@JonBoyJ yeah agreed, while series s looks good on paper and is affordable, it seems to have played a big part in holding back xsx and ps5…
one of the most unoptimized games with UE5, the game runs poor even on high end pc's
@endlessleep you are your own worst enermy.
Removed - trolling/baiting; user is banned
@VokDaWiibSlayer and you are banned
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...