
Last week, Xbox boss Phil Spencer mentioned how Microsoft intended to treat Call of Duty like Minecraft when asked about the series' future post-acquisition.
Now, during an interview with the 'Same Brain' YouTube channel, Phil has reiterated his comments about making Call of Duty as accessible as possible - in a very brief comment touching on the Activision deal. Here's exactly what he had to say, noting how "as long as there is a PlayStation out there", Call of Duty will be on it:
"Yeah, we're not taking Call of Duty from PlayStation... that's not our intent, our intent is not to do that, and as long as there is a PlayStation out there to ship to, our intent is that we continue to ship Call of Duty on PlayStation similar to what we've done with Minecraft, since we've owned that."
"We've expanded the places where people can play [Minecraft] we haven't like reduced the places, and it's been good, it's been good for the Minecraft community in my opinion and I want to do the same as we think about where Call of Duty can go."
As for Xbox players, Phil says the "biggest addition" will be some more "great games" coming to Game Pass. In saying this, there will also reportedly be some restrictions due to Sony's existing agreements with Activision Blizzard.
In his original comments to The Wall Street Journal last week, Phil said he would love to see Call of Duty made available on as many different screens as possible - using Minecraft as an existing example, and also name-dropping the Switch.
What are your own thoughts about all of this? Comment below.
[source youtu.be]
Comments 31
This deal was never about keeping Call of duty away from other platforms. This is to grow its mobile and PC marketshare in a market they don’t have much to anything going on in. I’m sure they will keep the next main game Blizzard does to Xbox and PC. I am Sure we will see smaller exclusives for Xbox and PC from this deal but Cod being taken off PlayStation would be way to much negative PR for the Xbox brand and would do them more harm than good.
Xbox is almost having to treat PlayStation like an only child where it's parents are expecting another. "We promise we will love you the same".. that kinda thing.
Keeps going on about call of duty all I really care about are crash & spyro
@Kaloudz yeh it's a water is wet moment , only cause sites like pushsquare posted about the 3 year deal but didn't mention it was about parity that most ppl believe it was microsoft offering a 3 year deal to KEEP it on playstation
Removed - inappropriate
How come this deal is just solely focused on COD? That’s what big Jim has been complaining about since the acquisition was announced right? But what about Overwatch, is that not massive in it own right? Diablo, games like that.
I don’t understand.
I do think this is slight shift in position, or at least a clarification, which is why its been reported so heavilly.
But now its been said, or clarified, can we not move on and get the deal done?
Dont care for COD, but theres plenty of other teams and titles we could see on gp, and the sooner we see them the better!
@Fenbops The metrics of COD dwarf everything else by a huge margin, and represent a significant revenue stream on ps. Its the most successful game not developed in Japan...
The other titles will hurt a little of course, but they do not represent such a large proportion of income as cod, so thats just life and ps just have to deal with it.
Its only because cod is so huge that the authorities are looking at all...
What's amazing is that all talk COD makes it that much easy for Xbox to make other Activision Blizzard title to be exclusive without even scrutiny. Diablo, Star Craft, Crash Spyro Warcraft and so on. Just give PlayStation COD and let other ip become exclusive to Xbox ecosystem.
This is getting boring now, to a point where every article is the same. Pretty sure there was an article a few days ago about it was being treated like Minecraft.
This could be an amazing chance for Xbox to have some more exclusives that they need to compete better with Sony but I agree with Tonmoy, Just let Sony have COD but there’s plenty more you can keep as Xbox exclusives like Crash, Spyro, Diablo, Overwatch and so on.
Microsoft should just keep this up, and once the deal goes through drop both hands and say, cya PS. If anyone wants to play CoD get an xbox, PC or mobil.
@Titntin I sometimes forget how big COD is, kind of puts it into perspective when Sony will argue to keep that one game while keeping quiet about others.
Honestly I don’t care about this deal, Activision Blizzard make next to nothing I’m actually interested in 🤣 It’s been fun watching the drama unfold though.
Notice that Phil Spencer is very careful to say that as long as Sony has a Playstation to 'ship' to, they will continue to ship CoD to it. In other words, as long as they can 'sell' CoD on Playstation, they will continue to make CoD available.
However, Cloud based options will be exclusive to MS on whatever Platforms you access Cloud on - whether that's PC, Console, TV, Mobile etc. They certainly won't be putting CoD into PS+ or whatever 'streaming/cloud' service Playstation has.
In the future, maybe several generations time, you could see its not sustainable or cost effective to make a Console powerful enough to play the latest games at an affordable price. If/when this happens, MS IPs, of which CoD would be, will be exclusive to MS. Its not as if you can't access on your TV App through Xbox Game Pass and if you want to play Sony's games, you'll probably need a PS+ app subscription too.
It works both ways - I don't expect Sony to put Destiny on Game Pass either but they will 'sell' Destiny on Xbox as long as MS continues to make Hardware...
Blah blah blah. Surely everybody knows this by now? Surely everybody knows the real arguments always been about the marketing rights and how it’s distributed by now? Surely everybody knows the most money is in the mobile division that comes with this deal by now?
Yet here we are…same conversation
If Phil put as much effort at ensuring games came out as he does to his social media presence we’d be eating good this Christmas over on Xbox.
Funny thing, Deathloop was late to Xbox because of Sony in spite of Microsoft owning the studio for a while now, same with Call of Duty, with exclusive content locked to PS and now being acquired by Microsoft. Don't forget about Final Fantasy VII Remake, Intergrade, Rebirth and Forspoken.
If Sony could, they'd buy Activision Blizzard and make everything exclusive to a console that you can't even buy but, since they can't, they buy temporarily exclusivity and extra modes and bash Microsoft hypocritically in the meantime.
@Kaloudz It's mostly PS fanboys thinking that Jim Ryan can't do no wrong. They obviously can't see what a ***** he is and just drink the kool-aid.
Jim’s opposition to this deal have never been about the exclusivity, because they likely known this by now. The whole “they only offered 3 years” was simply an attempt at weaponizing their fans.
From the early statements revealed in Brazil, and later in the UK, what Jim is terrified of is the potential dominance this might give Xbox on subscription gaming services. This will be a huge boost to game pass, both PC and console, and it will be a boost PSN++ would never be able to match.
Jim is terrified that subscriptions are indeed the future, and Xbox will be unbeatable once that future arrives.
As long as I get it on Game Pass, I don't care if it stays on PS. I can't lie and say I don't enjoy the whining though
So tired of hearing about this. Really hope it just gets done and we can all move on
@redd214 agree. Both companies for different reasons have made this a drama we would rather forget.
We all know its going to go through in the end. Posturing just makes both parties look pretty stupid.
It's crazy that people still think it won't be on Playstation consoles 3 years from now.
They like to point to past examples like bethesda where they were vague about whether games would be exclusive. There has not been anything close to vague statements with COD. Calling out the entire franchise and openly stating that it specifically will continue to release on Sony and maybe even Nintendo platforms as long as there are platforms to release them on should put the speculation to rest but I guess not.
@Fenbops they’re not even close to COD!! COD sells 30 million+ copies each game!!
@Somebody originally Phil Spencer did say COD will remain on Playstation for a few years. A few years is 3 or 4. Sony said this wasn’t good enough. Why didn’t Phil Spencer say this from the start? Because their first intention was to make it exclusive. They’ve now decided they’d rather the deal go thro and COD remain on Playstation than the deal be quashed an COD still remains on Playstation.
Plus console COD sales are approx 70% on Playstation. It would have absolutely looked like MS were trying to hurt Playstation an monopolise the gaming industry.
@jordan1992 the deal sony referenced was for 3 guaranteed years in addition to the 2-3 of their current marketing deal with COD. This makes sense for a couple reasons. 1 - Six years from now will be at or near the next generation. It would be a logical place to have a contractual agreement end. 2 - you will never get a lawyer to agree to a contractual abligation that forces you to do something FOREVER. Call of Duty could fail and no longer be profitable, the gaming landscape can and probably will be completely different in 10 years. It could be possible that said forever contract would force xbox to make COD for playstation plus since physical consoles have become digital storefronts available on any device. So xbox is never going to sign something saying we will make a yearly game forever for PS. 3 - you can agree to a contract again at anytime. Just because it was for 3 years now doesn't mean they plan to end the contract then. It's possible they would ask for something in return from Sony in renegotiations but like Phil says, as long as there is a playstation console there are more than 200 million reasons to put COD on there.
They have not just now decided this. Xbox has been saying it makes no sense to have it be exclusive since the deal was announced. He keeps reiterating the same message but people still somehow think it will be an Xbox exclusive.
They want GamePass everywhere, Sony has blocked it on their system, so technically they wouldn’t be lying if they block a release coming natively to PS5 store, but fully accessible through game pass. I don’t know, seems the way I’d do it.
@Somebody i’ve never heard him say anything of the sort. He said a few years, that’s it. Now he’s saying wat you’re saying they’d never do, as long as there is Playstation there’ll be Playstation COD. The contract wouldn’t state Microsoft/Activision will make COD for Playstation forever, it’d say every COD “we decide to make” will come to Playstation the same time it comes to Xbox. That’s wat Sony wanted and only now Phil Spencer is saying the same. I bought Mod Warfare 2 on PS5 simply cos i have 2 tb storage upgrade. If an wen COD comes to Game Pass i’ll play COD on Xbox.
@jordan1992 microsoft president and vice chair Brad Smith (before phils promotion) confirmed in February 2022 that call of duty will never be an xbox exclusive and microsoft would continue to offer call of duty games to playstation.
https://screenrant.com/call-duty-never-xbox-exclusive-microsoft/
It has always been said that call of duty games will continue to be available for sony. People just stuck their fingers in their ears and insist that the opposite is true.
@Techno92LFC With Overwatch going with a FTP model there is no way it is becoming exclusive.
@Somebody i’ve never seen that before but who wrote it??? It says Microsoft announces their acquisition of Activision Blizzard. They did no such thing, they haven’t acquired them yet!!
@Tharsman they’ve got a fair way to go. There are twice as many PS+ subscribers than Game Pass subs. Vanguard i believe sold 30 mill copies on all platforms, even if every COD buyer subbed to Game Pass they still wouldn’t be there. Not to mention a lot don’t like Game Pass or PS+, seen a lot say they’d rather own their games.
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...