
Although the UK Competition and Markets Authority has today agreed to Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard, the regulator has had some harsh words to share about Microsoft's "tactics" along the way.
In an official press release, CMA chief executive Sarah Cardell criticised Microsoft's handling of the CMA's initial investigation (which resulted in the CMA blocking the deal), stating that the company "continued to insist on a package of measures that we told them simply wouldn’t work". Here's a longer excerpt of what she had to say:
"But businesses and their advisors should be in no doubt that the tactics employed by Microsoft are no way to engage with the CMA. Microsoft had the chance to restructure during our initial investigation but instead continued to insist on a package of measures that we told them simply wouldn’t work. Dragging out proceedings in this way only wastes time and money."
Ultimately, it was Microsoft's willingness to sell cloud streaming rights to Ubisoft that convinced the CMA to approve the acquisition, concluding that it's "better for competition, better for consumers and better for economic growth".
In fact, the entire press release is focused around these cloud streaming rights for Activision Blizzard titles, with the regulator suggesting that if Microsoft had retained them, it would have "lock[ed] up competition in cloud gaming as this market takes off". Instead, the CMA concludes that Ubisoft is a "strong and independent competitor with ambitious plans to offer new ways of accessing that content." As a result, Ubisoft will exclusively own the cloud versions of all Activision Blizzard games for the next 15 years outside the European Economic Area.
"The sale of Activision’s cloud streaming rights to Ubisoft will prevent the distribution of important, popular content – including games such as Call of Duty, Overwatch, and World of Warcraft – from coming under the control of Microsoft in relation to cloud gaming. The restructured deal substantially addressed the concerns that the CMA had following its original investigation, which concluded earlier this year."
"The CMA did identify limited residual concerns with the new deal, but Microsoft gave undertakings that will ensure that the terms of the sale of Activision’s rights to Ubisoft are enforceable by the CMA."
What are your thoughts on this? Let us know down in the comments section below.
Comments 24
No need to worry about that now
All done and dusted 😊
Business is dirty.
Is this CMA's way of trying to make it look like they are not blind while still taking money from MS to let the deal move along?
Got to love them still trying to save face and pretend they didn't fold like a cheap suit. Its adorable
"With the sale of Activision’s cloud streaming rights to Ubisoft, we’ve made sure Microsoft can’t have a stranglehold over this important and rapidly developing market. As cloud gaming grows, this intervention will ensure people get more competitive prices, better services and more choice. We are the only competition agency globally to have delivered this outcome."
The last sentence shows its all about trying to save face.
I also like how they also try to bury the fact its only for 15years, only mentioning it once in the whole press release lol
The other mind blowing fact is the CMA expect Ubisoft to be a huge player in cloud gaming, when they don't even own their own cloud gaming service, they use Lunar, and it's only available on PC.
Was this the CMA's first rodeo?
Oh, stfu you babies. Take the L and shove it where the sun don't shine. Leave some room for the FTC though.
All right CMA, you have been an international embarrassment, shamed my country and put off tech companies from dealing with us here… how about you get back in your box, cry into your baby blankets… oh and don't forget to GFY.
Lol. Well, Microsoft is the now the boss. And if the UK behaves, they will continue to get Windows products on their computers.
Screw you CMA and the FTC for that matter. What a bunch of buffoons.
Amazing (or not) that people don’t understand what the CMA actually do.
It’s the UK, they have to try and look smart and not defeated. It’s a narcissistic play that not many are buying. Glad the deal is done. The FTC will for sure waste some more taxpayer money tho. It’s what they do outside of losing.
they really do think that cloud streaming is going to take off
So the CMA punishes Microsoft for innovating in the cloud market, and they have to sell part of their acquisition of another software company so the deal can be done.
I'm still kinda disgusted at the CMA and FTC for blocking Microsoft in the first place. I would have understood if it were a hardware manufacturer and they were concerned about Microsoft becoming a monopoly in the market... But Microsoft was acquiring another software company...
Can anyone make this make sense to me?
The same CMA that said Nintendo wasn't part of the gaming market then lent their technical expertise when they declared it would be impossible to run call of duty on a switch console after Microsoft signed a deal with nintendo to put call of duty on their platform.
The CMA was also criticized by their own government for harming future business in the country.
@PsBoxSwitchOwner In this case they haven't done anything but make things worse for UK consumers. They are a far left group of progressives just like the FTC with a an ultimate goal of going after big tech just for the sake of it. If the CMA and FTC actually had sound arguments their cases would have been a lot stronger although I think they would have failed eventually.
@CMA Now say it without crying
CMA should take an introversive look at their own affairs before criticizing global businesses.
@HonestHick yes that’s exactly how the UK operates. Go figure.
There is a ton that happens in the background of these things politically. CMA should not be airing the dirty laundry here. I am sure there is a lot of dirty laundry with the CMA as well. Otherwise there would not have been a miscommunication on what it would take to get the deal approved.
For some reason MS thought it would get approved. For some reason CMA thought they were clear on what it would take to approve it.
@BeerIsAwesome second that.
While the regulators handled this whole saga about as badly as a chav on a night out. Their whole existence is to protect competition it isnt an "agenda against big tech" the point of their existence is to stop monopolies and who are most likely to try and gain a monopoly?....Big tech. And MS werent trying to pull this off to make gamers happy. Its to make money. And make it they will now.
But, ultimately ABK were looking to be bought out anyway and made the first move to be acquired. So the argument it was a monopoly move just fell flat on its backside.
An interesting side effect of the Ubisoft cloud deal is that there is zero chance Ubisoft will be acquired by Microsoft now. There is just no way the CMA will allow such a merger to go through precisely due to this cloud deal.
On the other hand, depending how long the deal is (its 15 years but there might be clauses that prevent MS to unilaterally refuse a renewal) there is a non insignificant change that Ubisoft just became extremely desirable acquisition target for Amazon, as they would own the rights to get CoD on Luna.
CMA acting like it's a world thought leader in future tech. They obviously know something no one else does.
Pretty sure a lot of people will have harsher things to say about the CMA. It was clear they wanted to block the deal somehow, they picked very questionable grounds to block the deal and their research and data on that chosen topic was not great. Yes they get to pretend they 'got their win' in some sense, but in the grander scheme of things they embarrassed themselves.
A grand waste of time for all parties involved except for gaming websites, who were granted a long string of news updates.
🤑
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...