If you're a fan of the 1999 PlayStation 1 classic Chrono Cross, you'll undoubtedly be keeping a close eye on the upcoming remaster Chrono Cross: The Radical Dreamers Edition which arrives this Thursday, and the first reviews have been going live for it today, revealing some interesting opinions about whether it's a worthy HD upgrade.
The vast majority of reviews seem to be for the PlayStation and Nintendo Switch versions so far (we tried, but couldn't get our hands on an Xbox copy), and if you look at Metacritic, the scores are definitely impressive, sitting on a 77 for PlayStation 4 and an 82 for Nintendo Switch at the time of writing, with some outlets full of praise for it.
Here's a couple of reviews that have praised the game quite substantially:
Siliconera (Nintendo Switch) - 10/10
"Chrono Cross has always been an essential JRPG, and this The Radical Dreamers Edition remaster makes it feel even more important. The story, the design direction, the way it handles its parallel worlds and characters, its battle system, and its precursor game that shows how it grew? They’re all extraordinary. Like Chrono Trigger before it, it is historically important and an example of exemplary game design."
TheGamer (PlayStation 4) - 4/5
"Chrono Cross: The Radical Dreamers Edition is a remaster that should have happened years ago, and I’m so glad that the JRPG classic has finally received the respect it deserves in the modern landscape. You seldom see it discussed alongside other genre greats in the mainstream zeitgeist, but perhaps that perception will change now Serge’s iconic adventure is available on a selection of platforms with myriad improvements. Not all of its changes are for the best, but are easy enough to accept when the underlying game is still so masterful."
If you go a little further down the list, however, you'll find some outlets that are significantly less impressed with Chrono Cross: The Radical Dreamers Edition, and specifically its performance. The Switch version doesn't seem to be affected as badly, but most of the PlayStation 4 reviews we've seen point out the poor performance in general.
Our sister site Push Square has been critical of the performance on PS4, calling it a "shockingly poor remaster of a divisive PS1 RPG," and stating "it beggars belief that a title from 1999 could run this badly on modern hardware."
Here are a couple of less positive reviews about the game that we've found:
Wccftech (PlayStation 4) - 4.5/10
"The crippled frame rates, which remain a constantly fluctuating 15-20 FPS in battles, are only exacerbated by providing players with the ability to slow down and fast forward gameplay without having to finish the game first. In another time, another place, perhaps Chrono Cross The Radical Dreamers Edition would be more critically revered this second time around but I can find little reason to recommend this particular bundle over the PlayStation 1 release based on the core game alone."
Push Square (PlayStation 4) - 4/10
"Parts of Chrono Cross really haven't aged well, but it's still a charming, characterful JRPG that evokes feelings of the genre's golden age on PS1. It's a game that deserves better than The Radical Dreamers Edition, which, at least at launch, is a dreadfully poor remaster. Crippled by frame rate issues, it beggars belief that a title from 1999 could run this badly on modern hardware. Unless you're desperate for the nostalgia, we strongly recommend waiting to see whether Square Enix releases a patch to improve the package on PS4 and PS5 before buying."
It remains to be seen how Chrono Cross: The Radical Dreamers Edition performs on Xbox One (along with Series X and S), although we're assuming it has a lot in common with the PlayStation 4 version, as is usually the case.
Is it worth a purchase? The Metacritic score says yes, but a couple of those reviews have left us second-guessing...
Are you picking up Chrono Cross: The Radical Dreamers Edition on Xbox this week? Tell us down below.
Comments 15
The bad reviews scare me. This is my favorite game of all-time, and if it is indeed messed up, I hope patches can resolve it.
Funny to think that judging by the reviews, that you can emulate it on Xbox better than Square can with the official release
A rule generally goes if Push gives it a bad review then ignore it completely. In fact ignore any of their pathetic biased reviews. They gave GTA 5 9.10 for ps5 when its a 10yr old game rereleased yet again but gave Ghostwire Tokyo a 7/10 when its an original IP which is getting 9s everywhere else.
Ghostwire is not getting 9's everywhere plenty of 7s and even some 4's
Seems like that siliconera one is the odd one out, seems like the game has some issues at launch so deserves them low scores
@nickwpearce I've seen loads of 9s, not a single 4 so love to know where you've imagined that from.
Wonder if the game performance issues are platform/PlayStation specific.
@Tharsman I’ve heard there a big performance issues on Switch as well.
@Resi32
Didn't imagine ***** mate
https://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-5/ghostwire-tokyo/critic-reviews
Scroll to the bottom past all the 7s and a ***** load of 6a to get to the imaginary 4s!
@nickwpearce that's metacritic another one to be instaignored. Bit like rotten tomatoes for films. Very biased
@Resi32 what? The only possible bias they could have is if they were being selective in which reviews they include and which they don't. Otherwise it's just providing an average score out of 100 of all reviews. Pretty sure the comment above yours was just pointing out the number of individual sites that had reviewed the game a low score. Nothing to do with metacritic itself
Has nothing to do with metacritic champ
Read the individual reviews
They just collect them all so you can find them
@BobLong-RickTangle they are extremely biased. Giving utter Cashcrap like Fifa a 10 out of 10 and then giving original IPs and good games a crap score is very biased. Just like their constant promotion of Amazon, its sponsorship plain and simple and has no place on a gaming website.
@Resi32 who are you talking about? I was commenting on your comment about metacritic being biased. Metacritic is a review aggregator - they do not review anything themselves
@Resi32 I don't find Push to be "biased" in any particular direction. I just think they have a few main reviewers with VERY different opinions on games. Sammy, Robert, and Liam's reviews are very different from each other within the same genre. Sammy loves GaaS and sports games....I think Liam would skewer most of what Sammy loves, etc.
I'd actually love for Push to adopt a Famitsu-style 3-way review system, not because it's the best system for the site, but because of the highly opposed tastes of their 3 main reviewers, it would really be interesting reading on a game.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...