What would a year be without another Call of Duty? Don't worry. Vanguard is here to fill the gap for this year's entry.
Reviews for the game are slowly pouring in, but there's enough out in the wild now to give us a feeling of what to expect this year.
Without further adieu, here's what critics are saying about Call of Duty: Vanguard:
Game Informer (8/10)
Call of Duty: Vanguard’s campaign misses the mark, but multiplayer and Zombies do the heavy lifting to get the title to a good place. If you’re most invested in the single-player experience, you can pass on this year’s entry, but if you’re into the other modes, Call of Duty remains an excellent choice for some shooting, looting, and zombie executing
PCGamesN (8/10)
Call of Duty: Vanguard is probably the most entertaining entry in the latest triptych (which now share a unified launch screen alongside Warzone). There aren’t many surprises to be found if you’ve already played Modern Warfare or Black Ops – Cold War, but if I were to recommend just one of the three, it would unquestionably be Vanguard.
GameSpot (7/10)
The thing about Call of Duty games is that, with each yearly iteration, you pretty much know what you're getting--and that's largely the case here. It's both a blessing and a curse for Vanguard, however. Elements of Vanguard feel like good additions to the franchise, but its ideas also don't always mix well with the series' framework. That framework is still strong, and the solid gunplay, exciting multiplayer, and inventive moments of the campaign are worth seeking out.
IGN - Single-Player Review (7/10)
With a strong cast of characters used to varying effect throughout to tell a tale that puts just about enough of a spin on the stories it's paying homage to, Call of Duty: Vanguard’s single-player campaign is an impressively cinematic depiction of World War II. That said, aside from a few standout moments sprinkled over its fleeting five hours, for the most part it plays it a little too safe in regards to mission variety to feel like a standout in the series.
VGC (3/5)
At launch, Call of Duty Vanguard feels like a solid step-up from Black Ops Cold War, but falls short of the benchmark that was Modern Warfare 2019. Together, Vanguard's three pillars make for a game that we’re frankly surprised is as cohesive and enjoyable as it is.
Eurogamer (3/5)
Vanguard, I suspect, will do well - Call of Duty does well! Its in-game store will sell silly outfits for its World War 2 operators. Pricey weapon skins will keep the money rolling in. As the Call of Duty menu screen swells, adding a new front to fight on even as we head into what's sure to be a difficult winter, Vanguard will do its bit for the war effort. But unlike the source material, Vanguard won't live long in the memory.
The consensus seems to pinpoint it being another enjoyable entry, but perhaps nothing too memorable in the pantheon of classic Call of Duty titles.
There's no Metacritic score for Xbox as of yet, however the PS5 version is sitting at a score of 79.
Are you picking up Call of Duty: Vanguard? Let us know in the comments below.
Comments 25
You can beat the campaign in just 4 hours. That's not good if you are only interested In the single player campaign.
@Chaudy
Sweet only 4 hours good i'm sick of campaigns that are 40+ hours long it gets boring after awhile
more of the same old same old review score 6
@John117 that's a bit harsh, millions of people buy those games, far cry, assassins creed, fifa, halo, GT, forza, are always the same game yet the masses still buy them yearly so do they get hate aswell
Call of duty needs a slight revamp, they have done all they can, they have done games past on the past, present and future, added zombies and battle Royale, what more can they do though?.....
Maybe do a Battlefield and have 120 player all out warfare, but then they would get slated for copying, I think call of duty is now a franchise that can't do anything right in the critics eyes
Campaign way to short for me.
I remember the old CODs having around a good 10-12 hours sometimes.
I will stick with my far cry 6 for fps exploration and adventure.
Then of course Halo In December.
This one looks pretty bad, an easy pass for me.
@John117
It will be interesting to see what kind of people shell out €60 for multiplayer only games or achievement hunters What are their lives like? What other choices do they make?
@FriendlyOctopus "Call Of Doodie"
@Originut Not on their site, but they still link a score on Google for their reviews.
I'm really done with the new CoDs... haven't enjoyed them for a long time.
I did just download the remaster of the OG Modern Warfare though... Not only does it still hold up, it's a ton more fun than the newer games.
@antstephenson 😂😂😂
@Originut Eurogamer in English doesn't give review scores, but they also have editions in other languages and some of them do use scores.
@Originut Yeah, it's a bit odd! I can only assume it's a backend facility that pops up on Google somehow.
As single player only I'll get round to it eventually at the right price. For a short single player experience it's always bombastic fun but not worth full price for me. ymmv.
I haven't actually played ANY since Advanced Warfare but have them all up to Modern Warfare (2019), expecting to play through them all soon... and free up lots of HD space
Was hoping for Modern Warfare 3 remastered first before doing so though to play the whole trilogy back to back.
@Originut @Flurbdurb It's an SEO thing. Appearing on Google Reviews marginally helps their overall ranking. Likely the only reason they are doing it.
Easy pass from me. WWII really was an extreme let down and it was my first COD since Black Ops because that's when I thought the series was getting stale. Black Ops at least had crossbows and hatchets to play. Not my thing anymore.
Yeah, this only has an 80 on OpenCritic so must be as bad as Forza Horizon 5. Oh wait, that was this site that gave FH5 an 8. It’s 92 on OpenCritic. Nevermind then…
I think it's actually good not modern warfare good but a lot better than cold war good
@antstephenson My joke was removed for some reason 😒
I put this on the Chrimbo List now Dying Light 2 is delayed, and I enjoyed the beta. I to like the BF 2042 beta but really didn't.. I just couldn't get into the game so another COD for me for my twitch shooting kicks.
@Originut Yeah definitely more interested in MW3 remaster. There were a few reports/rumours that it wasn't being made, that would suck. But ultimately I would just have to play it x360!
Especially looking forward to MW 2019. Hoping to start on my COD mission before Halo comes out as I need the space!
Happy gaming!
Enjoyed modern warfare but the warzone integration completely ruined it for me so I'll wait a few month & see if warzone gets forced into the game before I make a decision on weather to buy it or not
I'm so done with COD, If you wanna play a real shooter wait for Halo Infinite in a month..
You have to download the campaign as a seperate add on
*Edit 2 seperate add ons
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...