The highly-anticipated Alan Wake Remastered officially launches this Tuesday (October 5) across all platforms, and the first reviews have begun dropping across the web today, including here at Pure Xbox!
Here's what the verdict is so far (spanning both the Xbox Series X|S and PS5 versions):
Pure Xbox (9/10)
"If you've never played Alan Wake, this is the best possible way to experience the game. For anyone who loves horror or Remedy's other titles, there's a ton to unpack here with an engaging narrative and stellar gameplay.
The remastered enhancements bolster the game even further, giving it a place in today's gaming world, and while the gameplay doesn't perhaps hold up as well as it did in 2010, Alan Wake Remastered is still as joyous as it was back then and a perfect treat for the Halloween season."
Video Games Chronicle (4/5)
"Where you land on the remaster, and whether to justify a purchase, depends on your past with the game. At the top of the pile are PlayStation owners, who get to experience Alan’s misty mystery for the first time and in a very shiny form to boot. They’re followed by Xbox Series S/X players who get to see what the 2010 release really should have looked like. But for PC owners there’s not a great leap from what is already available on Steam for half the price."
Destructoid (8/10)
"I think this is an excellent game with a memorable narrative and some of the best forests I’ve ever ventured through in a video game. Yes, you can feel the skeleton of the 360 original throughout it — and yes, some of the bits inspired by Twin Peaks are really on the nose — but that’s more than negligible when everything else about it beckons you to keep playing."
IGN (7/10)
"Playing Alan Wake Remastered is a bit like taking an old horror hardcover off the bookshelf and wrapping it in a glossy dust jacket; it looks brand new on the surface, but the experience of actually thumbing through it remains the same and some of the edges of of its well-loved pages are starting to look a bit dog-eared."
Push Square (6/10)
"For existing fans, this no-frills remaster is the best way to experience the 2010 game on modern consoles, but in 2021, much of the title simply doesn't hold up. Without the benefit of nostalgia, Alan Wake doesn't work as horror because it's not scary, as a thriller because long stretches of the game are fantastically boring, or as an action game because the combat is uninspired and repetitive. There's an interesting central mystery here, but like Alan Wake himself, you'll have to go through hell to find it."
Reviews are still slowly pouring in for Alan Wake Remastered at the time of writing, but the Metacritic score for the Xbox Series X|S version is currently sitting at 84 based on 8 reviews. Not too shabby at all!
Are you picking up Alan Wake Remastered this week? Let us know down in the comments below.
Comments 16
And once again Push Square has the lowest review. I have a PS5 in addition to my Series X and I’ve been finding their reviews tiresome. It’s like they want to score low just to be different and controversial. I’m ready to give up Push Square.
@awp69 "But PlayStation owners used to best-in-class third person narrative adventures experiencing Alan Wake for the first time in 2021 might be left scratching their heads and wondering just what all the fuss is about."
This about sums it up over there.
I liked Alan Wake.
I do think that the levels started to drag towards the end - where most of the levels were more about running through the gauntlet than actual combat - but, then again, Alan Wake is just a writer and not a battle-hardened soldier, so encounters are more about survival than actually just going in guns blazing.
I'd give Alan Wake an 8/10.
Oh well, it is just one person's opinion, nothing to get too bent out of shape about. But that particular line from the review does seem a touch elitist.
@awp69 Their review also begins with comparing it to the latest and greatest story-focused games on PS4/5.
"But PlayStation owners used to best-in-class third person narrative adventures..."
I mean, duh! I'm sure AW doesn't have the most varied and diverse gameplay but really?
@BrilliantBill I also think that statement is telling. That kind of statement in a review makes it sound like it was written as a PS fanboy. And that isn’t warranted in a review.
Sorry to insist but I used to visit it because of my PS4 but Push Square staff has become a Sony trolls den. Sorry to be this straightforward but looking at the articles and reviews on there, how can it be explained with kinder words? Someone help me. @NEStalgia, maybe? 😅
I see people complain about combat, but I don’t remember ever having an issue with it. I got a thrill out of trying to survive and not get killed, so I didn’t get any sense of it being repetitive or boring.
@BrilliantBill @awp69 Ok but here's the thing, I was impressed by Naughty Dog's graphics (and voice acting) on PS4 but I thought that third-party games like Rise of the Tomb Raider looked and played better and, gameplay-wise, most PS4 exclusives are okay at best: all the Uncharted games, The Last of Us I & II, God of War, Horizon Zero Dawn, Days Gone... My favourite PS4 exclusive is Wipeout Omega Collection and Sony shut that studio down.
Yeesh Push Square coming off very pretentious in their review. Their points don't even make sense. They seem to care more about flexing how great PlayStation third person games are than covering the game. To give a game of the year candidate from 10 years ago a 6 just shows how much of a joke their review is. If it was a bad port that'd be one thing, but they are legit trashing the game itself altogether...
@Trmn8r Pretentious is a great way to describe the current PS following, and it's not really a surprise. Sony themselves have been curating this image, and the recent "director cuts" that aren't director cuts but are in fact definitive editions, just shows they are still on that path.
@GamingFan4Lyf I don’t think it’s that far from the pulse really. Alan Wake is a CULT classic for a reason, it’s just not everyone’s cup of tea.
When it released the gameplay and ‘combat’ was pretty bad even then IMO. Thankfully it made up for that with a mostly fantastic plot and atmosphere. I liked, not loved, it and can easily see someone who didn’t get on with it giving it a 6 now. It’s more than a bit Marmite!
@themightyant I am not necessarily saying their review is wrong, I just think basically saying “PlayStation does it better” doesn’t belong in the review.
@BlueOcean I would agree with Naughty Dogs game having a basically just ok gameplay. It is mostly true. However saying God of War also had a "just-ok" is selling it short IMO. GoW and RDR2 are possibly the best games of the last generation/last decade.
@awp69 I find most of their reviews are written from the perspective of a fanboy...
Pushsquare is a joke.
@GamingFan4Lyf For what it's worth I probably would have given Alan Wake an 8 when it came out too. Fluctuated between a 6 and a 9 throughout. The good outweighed the bad, mostly.
If you really dug the story, atmosphere and presentation I can see it being a 9 or a 10. A cult classic beloved by many.
But if playing for the first time, without nostalgia goggles on, and it doesn't grip you like that a 6 can be a fair review. I think it's correct to mention to people in those cases that there are better, and newer, adventures on PS. They're not wrong.
That doesn't take away from anyone else who want's to give it another score even a 9 or 10.
What I think their review failed to do was say that the game is like Marmite, you should try it as might just love it!
@Link41x @GamingFan4Lyf Absolutely.
@BrilliantBill And I respect that!
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...