Earlier this year, we noticed that Ubisoft's Skull & Bones had moved to a standard $70 price point rather than the $60 adopted by Assassin's Creed Valhalla and Far Cry 6, and now the studio says this will be the norm in the future.
Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot was questioned about this by Axios earlier this week, with the outlet pointing out that more publishers are moving to the same price point these days, but Ubisoft hadn't committed to it until recently.
Here's what Guillemot had to say:
"Some of the games will come at the same price as the competition. The big AAA games will come at $70."
Interestingly, the recently revealed Assassin's Creed Mirage won't be part of this $70 pricing, as the Standard Edition is already being sold for $50 on the Ubisoft Store. This is seemingly because the game is intended to be a "shorter, more narrative-driven" experience than recent Assassin's Creed games, and is therefore cheaper as well.
But yeah, it's worth keeping in mind that major AAA games from Ubisoft will be retailing for a higher price in the future, beginning with Skull & Bones this November. Sounds like a good time to launch Ubisoft Plus on Xbox, eh Ubisoft...?
What are your thoughts on this? Let us know down in the comments section below.
[source axios.com]
Comments 26
Well we all knew it was going to happen.
If a game is of ultra top AAA quality to me, then I don’t mind to much.
I'd rather pay $70 for a full and complete game without MTX, micro-DLC, added grind, lootboxes, etc. than pay $50/$60 for an incomplete game with those things.
That said Ubisoft want to have their cake and eat it too, they will charge $70 but will also add MTX etc. THAT is disgusting.
@themightyant yeah selling the games at $70 is ok without the MTX but they will definitely do both which is rubbish.
Haha who was excited for Skull and Bones when it was £60?! Now it's £70. This'll be Babylons-Fall-level of DOA.
Sony did it with gt7 and from what I've read sales haven't been bad so if they can get away with it so will others
Not for me they won't. I'm not paying $70 for any game just to receive it day 1 and then still have to wait weeks, months or longer to receive all the content and it being patched/fixed to be in a playable state and also knowing that it will drop in price and be a lot cheaper in a month or two - like all Ubisoft games...
If they don't sell in the quantities they expect, they either 'drop' prices or reverse their decision to raise prices in the first place - vote with your wallet - they 'NEED' to sell to get money in, you don't 'need' to buy - certainly not 'Day 1' as they won't run out of Supply...
Hopefully $70 doesn't mean £70 again. I also won't be paying that much for a video game either. Regardless of what title it is. The prices will go up and up and up until companies hit the point where their profits no longer increase. If everyone buys games at £70 they'll be £80 next, then £90 etc... Until the entire gaming industry is funded through whaling by the console fanboys.
I'd defend up to $100 games, but not while they are carved up and sold off in tiny little chunks with more thought going in to how to stock a digital store of useless items.
Any game that has any kind of in game digital store is automatically not worth more than £20.
I'd like to go ahead and confirm then that moving forward, I will not be purchasing any Ubisoft game new.
I have little time enough for games as is. This simply helps makes choosing the games I will play, easier.
My high hopes for Assassins creed Mirage have been destroyed by this news. If Ubisoft, of all devs, believes that this game is not full price value then it must be clearly below AAA tier.
They also decided that service game Skull and Bones was worth the $70 tag. If any game needed a lower entry point it would be Skull and Bones where they will be trying to maintain a wide audience to sell cosmetics to. If this game is $70 and their flagship franchise, Assassins Creed, is not then what does that mean for the quality of Mirage?
At least Ubisoft games hit bargain bin prices of $20-30 within a year of release.
They can CHARGE that, but I'm not paying that. Particularly when their games won't be sold at that, but instead will be pushed out with several more tiers of extras. So if you want the full game you'll have to pay more than $70 plus extra microtransactions and DLC.
There's a reason I haven't bought a Ubisoft game at release since Assassin's Creed 2.
Well I'm looking for shorter and cheaper games, so see you later Ubisoft. Won't miss the maps with all the chores and checklists either.
@themightyant "That said Ubisoft want to have their cake and eat it too, they will charge $70 but will also add MTX etc. THAT is disgusting."
Every publisher wants to have their cake and eat it too. It's not like Ubisoft is the only one charging up front and tossing MTX.
Either way, I used to be a day-one buyer of Assassins Creed and Far Cry games. Ubisoft just has this... horrible (generous?) habit of making huge sales rather quickly, though, of the Gold Editions on top, making it cheaper to just wait a few months and get the whole game plus season pass for under standard edition launch price, so it's very likely Valhalla was my last day one Ubisoft game. Well... I might go for Mirage, since its only $50, although i bet it will be $30 within a few months.
Ubiquitous-soft won’t be getting $70 from me.
In my stupid and unsolicited opinion; day 1 prices are for streamers and YouTubers that want lots of views. You don’t need to own/play games anymore to be “part of the conversation.” Everyone is part of the conversation now.
Also—I bought Far Cry 6 for $12 last month so screw $70 price points for the entry level versions of their games.
Also I’m old and cranky and don’t even know why I’m posting here or anywhere to be perfectly honest.
@Tharsman Not True. Yes Ubisoft aren't alone but most Nintendo and Sony games come complete with no MTX. Many publishers and studios also don't have MTX in full priced games. It's a blight especially in single player adventures like AC where they deliberately make the game grindier than it ever was and then sell you the 'solution'. It's disgusting and needs to be called out.
But I definitely wouldn't call their reliable discounts a horrible habit. You can almost be guaranteed it will be 25% off within 3 months. 50% off within 4-12 months and bargain basement within 1-2 years, especially at retail. Then they will do all they can to get their games on every subscriptions service they can within 2 years. That is brilliant, it means you know what to expect and you can jump in when it suits your budget.
I also used to be a day 1 buyer of AC/FC/Etc. Now I wait for a deep sale or subscriptions services. There's always plenty to play in the meantime.
Everyone here in the comments knows exactly what to do - get the game in the certain sale ubisoft puts on after a matter of weeks. Give it 2 months and all the games have gone into a deep sale.
Nah ta, rather wait for the inevitable sale price on the games.
@themightyant dont worry you will pay for both a 70$ for base game and more for DLCs ....you can thank sony later for pushing this price
£70 for me isn't a problem as long as the game isn't broken and has content worth the price, for example babylon's fall in regret buying whilst HFW I'd pay £80 for.
Then again these companies put the prices up yet I have yet to purchase a game physically for £70, retailers usually sell for £60, so I suppose the only ones these price rises are effecting are those who buy everything digitally.
I am ok with waiting for the sale. Then there is time for the truth about the game to over power the hype...
I counter your $70 with $40... and pray I don't change it to $20.
I'm not worried because Ubisoft is not Nintendo, they offer good discounts after some time.
Like others have said have no problem paying $70
For a game especially from Ubisoft because they never see a steep drop in price months after release.
Take my money.
I, like many her, love paying more stuff.
Please charge me more big corporations. Please.
I live in Denmark, and this change is gonna suck so much.
We’ve already been paying 75$ for as long as I can remember, but the price increase, will probably mean we’re looking at 100$ releases here
That fine, I have Gamefly and I will just wait for used copies of a game that I want to play.
@Martsmall With sports and racing gamers companies can get away with anything they want. Those people pay $70 every year for roster updates, then for loot boxes afterwards.
And still 20 bucks six months later.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...