We highlighted CrossfireX's campaign earlier this week in a preview from Easy Allies, and they seemed generally quite positive about the game (comparing it to the original Xbox title Black), but IGN has been much more scathing.
The outlet was given access to a couple of early campaign missions for the preview, and described the single-player portion as a game "trapped in the Xbox 360 era", calling the enemies "generic", describing missions as "filled with tired tropes", and criticising the story as "shallow" and the gameplay as "a bit boring".
Ouch.
"I’ve been tremendously excited for CrossfireX as the trailers we’ve seen have been flashy, bombastic, and visually impressive. Sadly, none of that was present during the few chapters we had the opportunity to experience early as part of this preview.
Enemies look and sound generic, and they aren’t particularly smart either, walking right into your bullets if you’ll let them. The levels we did play had little of the visual flair in the marketing material, and the missions are filled with tired tropes like waiting for a guy to open a door, forced walking so you can be delivered narrative over coms, and of course a dash of campy military ops dialogue sprinkled in."
The campaign is being developed by Remedy Entertainment (Alan Wake, Control, Quantum Break), and will serve as the paid aspect of CrossfireX (no prices revealed yet), with the multiplayer being a free-to-play offering. The entire package is currently set to release on February 10th, 2022.
There are only a few written previews that have gone live to date, and the impressions are all over the place. To give you a better picture of the various opinions that are out there right now, here's what else we've managed to find so far:
TheGamer
"CrossfireX is a decent attempt to bring a story into the series, and while it’s got an intriguing tale, I’m not sure if Remedy’s gameplay is good enough to make me want to engage with it. It’s the game equivalent of comfort food - nothing special, but you know what you’re getting, and when you crave it, it hits the spot, even if you do feel a little guilty afterwards."
COG Connected
"CrossfireX’s single player campaign promises to be special. It isn’t revolutionary, but there are enough original ideas to keep it interesting. The action is plain fun. Swapping between characters keeps the story moving, and it’s perfected-paced. Some players might look at the single-player aspect as superfluous, but Remedy has obviously put a lot of effort into making it worth your time."
GameSpew
"It appears that CrossfireX is missing that certain something that usually makes a Remedy game so captivating. The story seems interesting, sure, and the gameplay is solid, but there’s nothing that stands out as being particularly unique; there’s no hook that keeps you glued to the screen."
Digital Trends
"For those who miss the days where shooters had lots of firefights and little to say, CrossfireX should satiate that hunger, even if it lacks some personality thus far. It’s a fast-paced game with snappy gunplay, promising action sequences, and an intriguing, intersecting story."
What are your hype levels like for CrossfireX right now? Let us know down in the comments below.
[source ign.com]
Comments 31
I heard a preview praising it but seeing as this is Destin (who was convinced metal gear remake was gonna show up at state of play) I'll be sure to wait and find out for myself. Destin is a weird guy, he has weirdest complaints and is always off target with predictions.
I do generally consider anything from IGN to be on par with Kotaku (ie worthless), but nothing about this game looked original from the start...I'm still hoping to be convinced otherwise.
So, basically the same accusations that can be made about 99% of the shooters out there. Also, I long for an old-school fps which focuses on fun shooting.
Quite disappointing and won't bother picking it up unless it comes to gamepass
All of this can be applied to call of Duty, yet you won't see IGN complain about those games
I mostly go to IGN as a general industry news source. Their opinions from just about all of their journalists generally just don't line up with mine. That said I agree with them in this case as I'm not sold on Crossfire yet. Maybe reviews will change my mind but I need to see a bit more gameplay.
I was never sold on this one. The trailers looked like it might offer something, but the premise sounds so boring.
Considering it's remedy's first stab at an FPS I wasn't expecting a game similar in quality to their previous ones.
Considering the campaign isn't coming to game pass however, it does sound like one I'd hold off with for full price
I always expected this campaign to be a poor mans COD, so this doesn't surprise me.
Remedy have no experience with the FPS genre and it just screamed to me they got contracted to make the campaign because they needed the cash influx before they struck the partnership with Epic Games.
I'm sure the multiplayer will do OK since that's F2P, but I can't see the campaign taking off considering it's not on Game Pass and who know what they'll charge...
Considering the kind of games they praise, I will take their criticism with a grain of salt.
The tenth of February, you say. Too many games, GOOD games, coming out around that time.
I wasn't expecting much from this.
It's not Remedy's game, they got hired to make a campaign for a game that already existed, between the technical and mechanical limits of that, and the fact they are obviously constrained by what the owners want for their universe, I was only expecting "nuggets" of Remedy in a soup of the original creators making.
It's like when Platinum makes a licenced game, you're not getting their A game.
Considering the other big FPS' with boring, tired tropes can get a 9 out of IGN, I'm guessing they are upset it didn't come with a cheque.
Considering the virtual silence on this and no one from Remedy coming out to champion it, as far as i've seen, I always expected this to be a pretty lazy work for hire project. That's my expectation. If it's better than that i'm happy.
@abe_hikura Snap! Exactly that, you put it far better though.
Given that Sony has bought Remedy im surprised that this is a Microsoft exclusive
@Richnj if it isn't woke it won't pass IGN reviews either.
@MyThoughts31 Uhhm....Sony bought who, now?
@NEStalgia
They're confused. It was definitely the other way around.
They are just mad that game is not woke enough...
I trust Easy Allies. IGN... Not so much.
The most tired trope of all is a reviewer saying something is full or tropes. It’s such a lazy review cliche and most tropes aren’t even tropes. It’s just a modern way of saying someone doesn’t like something. Most of them aren’t that frequent and it’s such an overused term.
Am I the only one that sees *stuck in the 360 era" as a positive?
So if IGN dont like it it must be pretty good then
IGN = Ignorant
Good to see the comment section is full of people subjective of reviewers, I mean multiplayer is free pvp pve etc so I can at least try that and if the gun play is good I'll get the campaign, 2ezy 2peezy
@JayJ insert rick and morty I don't care for your boos I've seen what makes you cheer.jpg
@Ihavenomouthandimust agree he will let something that most considerr nitpicking and make that a huge issue...ie the "tropes" which are in EVERY FPS the new CoD had some of the things he is actually complaining about like force walking and the waiting for a door to open...
@Blessed_Koz He makes me cringe lol and I honestly think he was pandering here as people were accusing him of being paid for praising Halo, also when he praises Xbox he gets moaned at for being a fanboy so he'll make a video criticising Xbox just to keep his other fans happy.
That aside he's just always wrong in my opinion lol
@XxEvilAshxX no because ign style 360 promotion is RROD
@blinx01 only a poor man's cod because cod is all about money money money now.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...