Alright, stick with us here. If you've never heard of the 'metaverse', it's what Meta (formerly Facebook) is calling "the next evolution of social connection." According to Mark Zuckerberg and his team, "3D spaces in the metaverse will let you socialize, learn, collaborate and play in ways that go beyond what we can imagine." It's unknown how its ultimately going to turn out, but comparisons are being made to the likes of Second Life and Ready Player One.
Today, Microsoft has outlined a vision for its own version of the metaverse, which includes features such as a virtual version of Microsoft Teams that will work with various VR and AR devices - as well as still be accessible in 2D.
This will extend to Xbox in the future, as Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella confirmed earlier today that he expects the brand to get involved over time, with a goal of transforming so-called "2D" games into "full 3D worlds".
Here's what Nadella had to say about it to Bloomberg:
“You can absolutely expect us to do things in gaming. If you take Halo as a game, it is a metaverse. Minecraft is a metaverse, and so is Flight Sim. In some sense, they are 2D today, but the question is, can you now take that to a full 3D world, and so we absolutely plan to do so.”
That's all we know about it so far, so it's really anyone's guess what Microsoft is planning here. Minecraft has tinkered with virtual reality in the past, and Microsoft Flight Simulator has full VR support on PC, but it sounds like Microsoft has further ambitions to try and interconnect these franchises as part of its metaverse in the future. Interesting stuff!
What are your thoughts on this? Let us know down in the comments section below.
[source bloomberg.com]
Comments 29
Makes sense to use their tech in hololens and bring it to consumers. Minecraft and flight simulator make sense to me as games that could be proof of concept of AR. I'm more interested in AR then VR personally.
Call me old fashioned but I just like my video games to be video games. It seems like the more they chase after this VR "vision of the future," the less I am interested.
@JayJ you and me both pal. Not sure I want in on this ‘metaverse’ at all it sounds just as bad for humanity as social media has been.
I’m not a big fan of these billion dollar companies allowing us only to see or experience what they want.
I hope Microsoft realizes there may be a (sizable) interest in these types of experiences among those boycotting Facebook / the Metaverse.
Apart from the obvious graphics over the years one of best purchases was a Dolby Vision sound system.
Just the rear speaker alone add so much to a game. Hearing things coming from behind you that alerts you to a person or even an attack or bullet or when searching using a radar sound.
It makes the sound be your behind sight.
I don’t think I could play games without that rear speaker sound now, like something, a sensory dimension would be missing.
@Dezzy70 It's Dolby Atmos you're talking about.
Vision is for the picture, like HDR but better.
I imagine these games standing on the side more like PSVR does.
Long term if we eventually move from screens to lens or even neuro interfaces then yes I guess we might be considered retro gamers - I'll probably give both a go in that case lol
@Letku
Thank you dam typo.
Yes Dolby Atmos, me tv does Dolby Vision.
I’ve had a hard day at work 😂
Wait, Facebook is changing their name to "Meta"?!
First, that's immensely stupid. Changing a recognizable, unique brand to a common sounding word just....who does that?
Second, who are they trying to fool? We know they're not changing their name to reflect their next generation of connected communication, but are changing it because congressional hearings have turned "Facebook" into a dirty word that's known in the state of California to require warnings, and to destroy children everywhere. Which is all true. But we all know name change like Google becoming Alphabet is a laundering and name rehabilitation scheme, not a new goalpost.
Teams is bad enough without adding VR or anything else. Stop the ride I wanna get off.
@Dezzy70 No worries Vision and Atmos are great. I have capable devices at home too.
Actually Atmos is about the height speakers. Either upward firing speakers or just really installed above you on the ceiling. Surround sound is about the rear speakers. 5.1, 7.1, 9.1 and so on.
Well if this is any indication they are planning on hardware for virtual spaces I really hope it's a focus on VR and not AR. I have no interest in AR and there is always a disconnect there with objects and the world. It's half baked VR, and there is no hardware out there today or in the next 5 years that will be able to fully integrate AR objects that is convincing to me. I'm definitely interested in fully realized, convincing, 100% virtual worlds and characters though and hope they are working on a true VR headset for this so called 'metaverse'.
If this it true please for the love of all that is holy don't let this be on Meta's verse.
Start off by allowing the Xbox app to be installed on the quest 2 without sideloading it plz Microsoft ,streaming my Xbox to the quest is so much better
@Fenbops @JayJ I’m with you guys. A world where people live their lives more or less isolated, with primary communication being fake/virtual and controlled would be the worst for humanity. These kinds of communication tools as supplementary might be useful, but if something like a full on meta verse actually comes, it will have an awful effect on humanity.
Checkout Microsoft Mesh, I mean the word metaverse is just Facebook marketing, MSFT has been planning this type of thing for years by laying down their cloud infrastructure & Azure. Tons of companies have wanted to do this & are actively working on it. The concepts have been around for decades as well, but damn looks like we are using metaverse now. Power of the internet
I will do nothing with FB or whatever they call themselves. FB is the suck.
@SplooshDmg on the Sex box you will.
@Hexamex-Tex @Originut There's no suggestion of that as far as I can tell, Microsoft is building its own version of the 'Metaverse'.
It's confusing, I know.
A good first step would be allowing third party VR headsets on xbox (no production costs for ms) to let us acces the proto metaverses like VRchat/Recroom (properly).
@NEStalgia - Facebook is still their bread and butter and the 'Meta' name probably wont stick. It's the company that owns the facebook / instagram etc platforms that is being renamed Meta
In the same way that Google used to be owned by Google but they changed the company name to Alphabet and Google (the search engine etc) is part of Alphabet
But nobody that i know of would use the name Alphabet to talk about the company formerly known as Google - it's still just Google to most of us
@FraserG hope so.
If they use anything associated with Facebook no thanks.
Facebook BS is the reason I'm replacing my Oculus Rift with another brand headset when it is time to upgrade.
Urghhh! It feels like the end days are upon us!
When they talk about "how freely they can move around and talk FACE to FACE" in the online Metaverse [4:44 in the video] my whole body convulsed. NO that is not talking Face to Face.
Why not just upload yourself to the cloud and do away with your body. Creepy AF.
@JayJ I feel the exact same way. If this is where all video games end up then I’m out!
@themightyant "Why not just upload yourself to the cloud and do away with your body. Creepy AF."
That's actually right on target with were these tech gurus want things to go. Remember when Wozniak actually talked about that sort of thing, and talked about "becoming gods." Completely unironically. He was serious. These people have gone so far off the deep end they actually talk like Marvel villains IRL. Only a matter of time before "immortality" and "save the planet" become "Store yourself on Azure for only $1599.99/mo. Includes Game Pass Ultimate."
These guys are the kings of the vague announcement. Between this and the Sega thing....
@F1at8mot0 Yeah that's how I feel as well. I tried out VR and I didn't like it, it's kinda neat for some things but not the way that I want to play video games. The whole VR scene has always felt very niche to me, like it appeals to a specific audience and I am not that audience.
For me it's just too isolating, when I play games I just like to sit back and game on a TV, it's nice because I am still aware of my surroundings and able to do other things while I am gaming. When you do VR gaming it becomes this highly isolated activity where you need to completely block out the outside world and get completely absorbed in the VR world. That and you gotta wear some TV on your face with headphones, and need to stay within view of some cameras/sensors. The whole thing just takes the act of gaming and makes it far too complicated. I also don't care for the games, anything VR with a lot of motion seems to give me motion sickness.
@NEStalgia I'd laugh out loud if it wasn't so prescient
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...